summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2024-09-10powerpc/pseries/eeh: Fix pseries_eeh_err_injectNarayana Murty N
VFIO_EEH_PE_INJECT_ERR ioctl is currently failing on pseries due to missing implementation of err_inject eeh_ops for pseries. This patch implements pseries_eeh_err_inject in eeh_ops/pseries eeh_ops. Implements support for injecting MMIO load/store error for testing from user space. The check on PCI error type (bus type) code is moved to platform code, since the eeh_pe_inject_err can be allowed to more error types depending on platform requirement. Removal of the check for 'type' in eeh_pe_inject_err() doesn't impact PowerNV as pnv_eeh_err_inject() already has an equivalent check in place. Signed-off-by: Narayana Murty N <nnmlinux@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://msgid.link/20240909140220.529333-1-nnmlinux@linux.ibm.com
2024-05-08powerpc/eeh: Fix spelling of the word "auxillary" and update commentGhanshyam Agrawal
Fix spelling of the word "auxillary" in arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c and arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h. Also update the eeh_set_pe_aux_size() comment to include the units. Signed-off-by: Ghanshyam Agrawal <ghanshyam1898@gmail.com> [mpe: Squash into one commit] Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://msgid.link/2ab034609285b21c309cd8ab26c937c846d37ee7.1703756365.git.ghanshyam1898@gmail.com
2022-05-04powerpc/eeh: Remove unused inline functionsYueHaibing
pseries_eeh_init_edev() is used exclusively in eeh_pseries.c, make it static and remove unused inline function. pseries_eeh_init_edev_recursive() is only called from files build wich CONFIG_HOTPLUG_PCI_RPA which depends on CONFIG_PSERIES and CONFIG_EEH, so can remove the unused inline version. Suggested-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220316104239.26508-1-yuehaibing@huawei.com
2022-05-04powerpc/eeh: Remove unused inline function eeh_dev_phb_init_dynamic()YueHaibing
commit 475028efc708 ("powerpc/eeh: Remove eeh_dev_phb_init_dynamic()") left behind this, so can remove it. Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210324140714.19612-1-yuehaibing@huawei.com
2021-12-23powerpc/kernel: Add __init attribute to eligible functionsNick Child
Some functions defined in `arch/powerpc/kernel` (and one in `arch/powerpc/ kexec`) are deserving of an `__init` macro attribute. These functions are only called by other initialization functions and therefore should inherit the attribute. Also, change function declarations in header files to include `__init`. Signed-off-by: Nick Child <nick.child@ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211216220035.605465-2-nick.child@ibm.com
2020-10-07powerpc/eeh: Delete eeh_pe->config_addrOliver O'Halloran
The eeh_pe->config_addr field was supposed to be removed in commit 35d64734b643 ("powerpc/eeh: Clean up PE addressing") which made it largely unused. Finish the job. Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201007040903.819081-1-oohall@gmail.com
2020-10-06powerpc/eeh: Clean up PE addressingOliver O'Halloran
When support for EEH on PowerNV was added a lot of pseries specific code was made "generic" and some of the quirks of pseries EEH came along for the ride. One of the stranger quirks is eeh_pe containing two types of PE address: pe->addr and pe->config_addr. There reason for this appears to be historical baggage rather than any real requirements. On pseries EEH PEs are manipulated using RTAS calls. Each EEH RTAS call takes a "PE configuration address" as an input which is used to identify which EEH PE is being manipulated by the call. When initialising the EEH state for a device the first thing we need to do is determine the configuration address for the PE which contains the device so we can enable EEH on that PE. This process is outlined in PAPR which is the modern (i.e post-2003) FW specification for pseries. However, EEH support was first described in the pSeries RISC Platform Architecture (RPA) and although they are mostly compatible EEH is one of the areas where they are not. The major difference is that RPA doesn't actually have the concept of a PE. On RPA systems the EEH RTAS calls are done on a per-device basis using the same config_addr that would be passed to the RTAS functions to access PCI config space (e.g. ibm,read-pci-config). The config_addr is not identical since the function and config register offsets of the config_addr must be set to zero. EEH operations being done on a per-device basis doesn't make a whole lot of sense when you consider how EEH was implemented on legacy PCI systems. For legacy PCI(-X) systems EEH was implemented using special PCI-PCI bridges which contained logic to detect errors and freeze the secondary bus when one occurred. This means that the EEH enabled state is shared among all devices behind that EEH bridge. As a result there's no way to implement the per-device control required for the semantics specified by RPA. It can be made to work if we assume that a separate EEH bridge exists for each EEH capable PCI slot and there are no bridges behind those slots. However, RPA also specifies the ibm,configure-bridge RTAS call for re-initalising bridges behind EEH capable slots after they are reset due to an EEH event so that is probably not a valid assumption. This incoherence was fixed in later PAPR, which succeeded RPA. Unfortunately, since Linux EEH support seems to have been implemented based on the RPA spec some of the legacy assumptions were carried over (probably for POWER4 compatibility). The fix made in PAPR was the introduction of the "PE" concept and redefining the EEH RTAS calls (set-eeh-option, reset-slot, etc) to operate on a per-PE basis so all devices behind an EEH bride would share the same EEH state. The "config_addr" argument to the EEH RTAS calls became the "PE_config_addr" and the OS was required to use the ibm,get-config-addr-info RTAS call to find the correct PE address for the device. When support for the new interfaces was added to Linux it was implemented using something like: At probe time: pdn->eeh_config_addr = rtas_config_addr(pdn); pdn->eeh_pe_config_addr = rtas_get_config_addr_info(pdn); When performing an RTAS call: config_addr = pdn->eeh_config_addr; if (pdn->eeh_pe_config_addr) config_addr = pdn->eeh_pe_config_addr; rtas_call(..., config_addr, ...); In other words, if the ibm,get-config-addr-info RTAS call is implemented and returned a valid result we'd use that as the argument to the EEH RTAS calls. If not, Linux would fall back to using the device's config_addr. Over time these addresses have moved around going from pci_dn to eeh_dev and finally into eeh_pe. Today the users look like this: config_addr = pe->config_addr; if (pe->addr) config_addr = pe->addr; rtas_call(..., config_addr, ...); However, considering the EEH core always operates on a per-PE basis and even on pseries the only per-device operation is the initial call to ibm,set-eeh-option I'm not sure if any of this actually works on an RPA system today. It doesn't make much sense to have the fallback address in a generic structure either since the bulk of the code which reference it is in pseries anyway. The EEH core makes a token effort to support looking up a PE using the config_addr by having two arguments to eeh_pe_get(). However, a survey of all the callers to eeh_pe_get() shows that all bar one have the config_addr argument hard-coded to zero.The only caller that doesn't is in eeh_pe_tree_insert() which has: if (!eeh_has_flag(EEH_VALID_PE_ZERO) && !edev->pe_config_addr) return -EINVAL; pe = eeh_pe_get(hose, edev->pe_config_addr, edev->bdfn); The third argument (config_addr) is only used if the second (pe->addr) argument is invalid. The preceding check ensures that the call to eeh_pe_get() will never happen if edev->pe_config_addr is invalid so there is no situation where eeh_pe_get() will search for a PE based on the 3rd argument. The check also means that we'll never insert a PE into the tree where pe_config_addr is zero since EEH_VALID_PE_ZERO is never set on pseries. All the users of the fallback address on pseries never actually use the fallback and all the only caller that supplies something for the config_addr argument to eeh_pe_get() never use it either. It's all dead code. This patch removes the fallback address from eeh_pe since nothing uses it. Specificly, we do this by: 1) Removing pe->config_addr 2) Removing the EEH_VALID_PE_ZERO flag 3) Removing the fallback address argument to eeh_pe_get(). 4) Removing all the checks for pe->addr being zero in the pseries EEH code. This leaves us with PE's only being identified by what's in their pe->addr field and the EEH core relying on the platform to ensure that eeh_dev's are only inserted into the EEH tree if they're actually inside a PE. No functional changes, I hope. Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200918093050.37344-9-oohall@gmail.com
2020-10-06powerpc/eeh: Delete eeh_ops->initOliver O'Halloran
No longer used since the platforms perform their EEH initialisation before calling eeh_init(). Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200918093050.37344-4-oohall@gmail.com
2020-10-06powerpc/eeh: Rework EEH initialisationOliver O'Halloran
Drop the EEH register / unregister ops thing and have the platform pass the ops structure into eeh_init() directly. This takes one initcall out of the EEH setup path and it means we're only doing EEH setup on the platforms which actually support it. It's also less code and generally easier to follow. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200918093050.37344-1-oohall@gmail.com
2020-07-26powerpc/eeh: Move PE tree setup into the platformOliver O'Halloran
The EEH core has a concept of a "PE tree" to support PowerNV. The PE tree follows the PCI bus structures because a reset asserted on an upstream bridge will be propagated to the downstream bridges. On pseries there's a 1-1 correspondence between what the guest sees are a PHB and a PE so the "tree" is really just a single node. Current the EEH core is reponsible for setting up this PE tree which it does by traversing the pci_dn tree. The structure of the pci_dn tree matches the bus tree on PowerNV which leads to the PE tree being "correct" this setup method doesn't make a whole lot of sense and it's actively confusing for the pseries case where it doesn't really do anything. We want to remove the dependence on pci_dn anyway so this patch move choosing where to insert a new PE into the platform code rather than being part of the generic EEH code. For PowerNV this simplifies the tree building logic and removes the use of pci_dn. For pseries we keep the existing logic. I'm not really convinced it does anything due to the 1-1 PE-to-PHB correspondence so every device under that PHB should be in the same PE, but I'd rather not remove it entirely until we've had a chance to look at it more deeply. Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200725081231.39076-14-oohall@gmail.com
2020-07-26powerpc/eeh: Rename eeh_{add_to|remove_from}_parent_pe()Oliver O'Halloran
The naming of eeh_{add_to|remove_from}_parent_pe() doesn't really reflect what they actually do. If the PE referred to be edev->pe_config_addr already exists under that PHB then the edev is added to that PE. However, if the PE doesn't exist the a new one is created for the edev. The bulk of the implementation of eeh_add_to_parent_pe() covers that second case. Similarly, most of eeh_remove_from_parent_pe() is determining when it's safe to delete a PE. Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200725081231.39076-12-oohall@gmail.com
2020-07-26powerpc/eeh: Remove class code field from edevOliver O'Halloran
The edev->class_code field is never referenced anywhere except for the platform specific probe functions. The same information is available in the pci_dev for PowerNV and in the pci_dn on pseries so we can remove the field. Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200725081231.39076-11-oohall@gmail.com
2020-07-26powerpc/eeh: Pass eeh_dev to eeh_ops->{read|write}_config()Oliver O'Halloran
Mechanical conversion of the eeh_ops interfaces to use eeh_dev to reference a specific device rather than pci_dn. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200725081231.39076-9-oohall@gmail.com
2020-07-26powerpc/eeh: Pass eeh_dev to eeh_ops->resume_notify()Oliver O'Halloran
Mechanical conversion of the eeh_ops interfaces to use eeh_dev to reference a specific device rather than pci_dn. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200725081231.39076-8-oohall@gmail.com
2020-07-26powerpc/eeh: Pass eeh_dev to eeh_ops->restore_config()Oliver O'Halloran
Mechanical conversion of the eeh_ops interfaces to use eeh_dev to reference a specific device rather than pci_dn. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200725081231.39076-7-oohall@gmail.com
2020-07-26powerpc/eeh: Remove VF config space restorationOliver O'Halloran
There's a bunch of strange things about this code. First up is that none of the fields being written to are functional for a VF. The SR-IOV specification lists then as "Reserved, but OS should preserve" so writing new values to them doesn't do anything and is clearly wrong from a correctness perspective. However, since VFs are designed to be managed by the OS there is an argument to be made that we should be saving and restoring some parts of config space. We already sort of do that by saving the first 64 bytes of config space in the eeh_dev (see eeh_dev->config_space[]). This is inadequate since it doesn't even consider saving and restoring the PCI capability structures. However, this is a problem with EEH in general and that needs to be fixed for non-VF devices too. There's no real reason to keep around this around so delete it. Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200725081231.39076-6-oohall@gmail.com
2020-07-26powerpc/eeh: Kill off eeh_ops->get_pe_addr()Oliver O'Halloran
This is used in precisely one place which is in pseries specific platform code. There's no need to have the callback in eeh_ops since the platform chooses the EEH PE addresses anyway. The PowerNV implementation has always been a stub too so remove it. Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200725081231.39076-5-oohall@gmail.com
2020-07-26powerpc/eeh: Move vf_index out of pci_dn and into eeh_devOliver O'Halloran
Drivers that do not support the PCI error handling callbacks are handled by tearing down the device and re-probing them. If the device being removed is a virtual function then we need to know the VF index so it can be removed using the pci_iov_{add|remove}_virtfn() API. Currently this is handled by looking up the pci_dn, and using the vf_index that was stashed there when the pci_dn for the VF was created in pcibios_sriov_enable(). We would like to eliminate the use of pci_dn outside of pseries though so we need to provide the generic EEH code with some other way to find the vf_index. The easiest thing to do here is move the vf_index field out of pci_dn and into eeh_dev. Currently pci_dn and eeh_dev are allocated and initialized together so this is a fairly minimal change in preparation for splitting pci_dn and eeh_dev in the future. Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200725081231.39076-3-oohall@gmail.com
2020-07-26powerpc/eeh: Remove eeh_dev.cOliver O'Halloran
The only thing in this file is eeh_dev_init() which is allocates and initialises an eeh_dev based on a pci_dn. This is only ever called from pci_dn.c so move it into there and remove the file. Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200725081231.39076-2-oohall@gmail.com
2020-07-26powerpc/eeh: Remove eeh_dev_phb_init_dynamic()Oliver O'Halloran
This function is a one line wrapper around eeh_phb_pe_create() and despite the name it doesn't create any eeh_dev structures. Replace it with direct calls to eeh_phb_pe_create() since that does what it says on the tin and removes a layer of indirection. Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200725081231.39076-1-oohall@gmail.com
2020-03-25powerpc/eeh: Rework eeh_ops->probe()Oliver O'Halloran
With the EEH early probe now being pseries specific there's no need for eeh_ops->probe() to take a pci_dn. Instead, we can make it take a pci_dev and use the probe function to map a pci_dev to an eeh_dev. This allows the platform to implement it's own method for finding (or creating) an eeh_dev for a given pci_dev which also removes a use of pci_dn in generic EEH code. This patch also renames eeh_device_add_late() to eeh_device_probe(). This better reflects what it does does and removes the last vestiges of the early/late EEH probe split. Reviewed-by: Sam Bobroff <sbobroff@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200306073904.4737-6-oohall@gmail.com
2020-03-25powerpc/eeh: Make early EEH init pseries specificOliver O'Halloran
The eeh_ops->probe() function is called from two different contexts: 1. On pseries, where we set EEH_PROBE_MODE_DEVTREE, it's called in eeh_add_device_early() which is supposed to run before we create a pci_dev. 2. On PowerNV, where we set EEH_PROBE_MODE_DEV, it's called in eeh_device_add_late() which is supposed to run *after* the pci_dev is created. The "early" probe is required because PAPR requires that we perform an RTAS call to enable EEH support on a device before we start interacting with it via config space or MMIO. This requirement doesn't exist on PowerNV and shoehorning two completely separate initialisation paths into a common interface just results in a convoluted code everywhere. Additionally the early probe requires the probe function to take an pci_dn rather than a pci_dev argument. We'd like to make pci_dn a pseries specific data structure since there's no real requirement for them on PowerNV. To help both goals move the early probe into the pseries containment zone so the platform depedence is more explicit. Reviewed-by: Sam Bobroff <sbobroff@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200306073904.4737-5-oohall@gmail.com
2020-03-25powerpc/eeh: Remove eeh_add_device_tree_late()Oliver O'Halloran
On pseries and PowerNV pcibios_bus_add_device() calls eeh_add_device_late() so there's no need to do a separate tree traversal to bind the eeh_dev and pci_dev together setting up the PHB at boot. As a result we can remove eeh_add_device_tree_late(). Reviewed-by: Sam Bobroff <sbobroff@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200306073904.4737-2-oohall@gmail.com
2020-03-25powerpc/eeh: Add sysfs files in late probeOliver O'Halloran
Move creating the EEH specific sysfs files into eeh_add_device_late() rather than being open-coded all over the place. Calling the function is generally done immediately after calling eeh_add_device_late() anyway. This is also a correctness fix since currently the sysfs files will be added even if the EEH probe happens to fail. Similarly, on pseries we currently add the sysfs files before calling eeh_add_device_late(). This is flat-out broken since the sysfs files require the pci_dev->dev.archdata.edev pointer to be set, and that is done in eeh_add_device_late(). Reviewed-by: Sam Bobroff <sbobroff@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200306073904.4737-1-oohall@gmail.com
2019-09-14powerpc/eeh: Fix build with STACKTRACE=nMichael Ellerman
The build breaks when STACKTRACE=n, eg. skiroot_defconfig: arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_event.c:124:23: error: implicit declaration of function 'stack_trace_save' Fix it with some ifdefs for now. Fixes: 25baf3d81614 ("powerpc/eeh: Defer printing stack trace") Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2019-09-05powerpc/eeh: Defer printing stack traceOliver O'Halloran
Currently we print a stack trace in the event handler to help with debugging EEH issues. In the case of suprise hot-unplug this is unneeded, so we want to prevent printing the stack trace unless we know it's due to an actual device error. To accomplish this, we can save a stack trace at the point of detection and only print it once the EEH recovery handler has determined the freeze was due to an actual error. Since the whole point of this is to prevent spurious EEH output we also move a few prints out of the detection thread, or mark them as pr_debug so anyone interested can get output from the eeh_check_dev_failure() if they want. Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190903101605.2890-6-oohall@gmail.com
2019-08-22powerpc/eeh: Remove unused return path from eeh_pe_dev_traverse()Sam Bobroff
There are no users of the early-out return value from eeh_pe_dev_traverse(), so remove it. Signed-off-by: Sam Bobroff <sbobroff@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/c648070f5b28fe8ca1880b48e64b267959ffd369.1565930772.git.sbobroff@linux.ibm.com
2019-08-22powerpc/eeh: Introduce EEH edev logging macrosSam Bobroff
Now that struct eeh_dev includes the BDFN of it's PCI device, make use of it to replace eeh_edev_info() with a set of dev_dbg()-style macros that only need a struct edev. With the BDFN available without the struct pci_dev, eeh_pci_name() is now unnecessary, so remove it. While only the "info" level function is used here, the others will be used in followup work. Signed-off-by: Sam Bobroff <sbobroff@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/f90ae9a53d762be7b0ccbad79e62b5a1b4f4996e.1565930772.git.sbobroff@linux.ibm.com
2019-08-22powerpc/eeh: Add bdfn field to eeh_devOliver O'Halloran
Preparation for removing pci_dn from the powernv EEH code. The only thing we really use pci_dn for is to get the bdfn of the device for config space accesses, so adding that information to eeh_dev reduces the need to carry around the pci_dn. Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com> [SB: Re-wrapped commit message, fixed whitespace damage.] Signed-off-by: Sam Bobroff <sbobroff@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/e458eb69a1f591d8a120782f23a8506b15d3c654.1565930772.git.sbobroff@linux.ibm.com
2019-08-22powerpc/eeh: Refactor around eeh_probe_devices()Sam Bobroff
Now that EEH support for all devices (on PowerNV and pSeries) is provided by the pcibios bus add device hooks, eeh_probe_devices() and eeh_addr_cache_build() are redundant and can be removed. Move the EEH enabled message into it's own function so that it can be called from multiple places. Note that previously on pSeries, useless EEH sysfs files were created for some devices that did not have EEH support and this change prevents them from being created. Signed-off-by: Sam Bobroff <sbobroff@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/33b0a6339d5ac88693de092d6fba984f2a5add66.1565930772.git.sbobroff@linux.ibm.com
2019-08-22powerpc/eeh: Initialize EEH address cache earlierSam Bobroff
The EEH address cache is currently initialized and populated by a single function: eeh_addr_cache_build(). While the initial population of the cache can only be done once resources are allocated, initialization (just setting up a spinlock) could be done much earlier. So move the initialization step into a separate function and call it from a core_initcall (rather than a subsys initcall). This will allow future work to make use of the cache during boot time PCI scanning. Signed-off-by: Sam Bobroff <sbobroff@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/0557206741bffee76cdfff042f65321f6f7a5b41.1565930772.git.sbobroff@linux.ibm.com
2019-05-30treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - rule 156Thomas Gleixner
Based on 1 normalized pattern(s): this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify it under the terms of the gnu general public license as published by the free software foundation either version 2 of the license or at your option any later version this program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful but without any warranty without even the implied warranty of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose see the gnu general public license for more details you should have received a copy of the gnu general public license along with this program if not write to the free software foundation inc 59 temple place suite 330 boston ma 02111 1307 usa extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier GPL-2.0-or-later has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 1334 file(s). Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net> Reviewed-by: Richard Fontana <rfontana@redhat.com> Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190527070033.113240726@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-02-22powerpc/eeh: Allow disabling recoveryOliver O'Halloran
Currently when we detect an error we automatically invoke the EEH recovery handler. This can be annoying when debugging EEH problems, or when working on EEH itself so this patch adds a debugfs knob that will prevent a recovery event from being queued up when an issue is detected. Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2019-02-22powerpc/eeh_cache: Add a way to dump the EEH address cacheOliver O'Halloran
Adds a debugfs file that can be read to view the contents of the EEH address cache. This is pretty similar to the existing eeh_addr_cache_print() function, but that function is intended to debug issues inside of the kernel since it's #ifdef`ed out by default, and writes into the kernel log. Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Sam Bobroff <sbobroff@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2019-02-22powerpc/eeh: Use debugfs_create_u32 for eeh_max_freezesOliver O'Halloran
There's no need to the custom getter/setter functions so we should remove them in favour of using the generic one. While we're here, change the type of eeh_max_freeze to u32 and print the value in decimal rather than hex because printing it in hex makes no sense. Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Sam Bobroff <sbobroff@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2019-02-05powerpc/eeh: Improve recovery of passed-through devicesSam Bobroff
Currently, the EEH recovery process considers passed-through devices as if they were not EEH-aware, which can cause them to be removed as part of recovery. Because device removal requires cooperation from the guest, this may lead to the process stalling or deadlocking. Also, if devices are removed on the host side, they will be removed from their IOMMU group, making recovery in the guest impossible. Therefore, alter the recovery process so that passed-through devices are not removed but are instead left frozen (and marked isolated) until the guest performs it's own recovery. If firmware thaws a passed-through PE because it's parent PE has been thawed (because it was not passed through), re-freeze it. Signed-off-by: Sam Bobroff <sbobroff@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2019-02-05powerpc/eeh: remove sw_state from eeh_unfreeze_pe()Sam Bobroff
eeh_unfreeze_pe() performs two operations: unfreezing a PE (which may cause firmware to unfreeze child PEs as well) and de-isolating the PE and it's children. To simplify this and support future work, separate out the de-isolation and perform it at the call sites (when necessary). There should be no change in behaviour. Signed-off-by: Sam Bobroff <sbobroff@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2018-10-13powerpc/eeh: Cleanup eeh_ops.wait_state()Sam Bobroff
The wait_state member of eeh_ops does not need to be platform dependent; it's just logic around eeh_ops.get_state(). Therefore, merge the two (slightly different!) platform versions into a new function, eeh_wait_state() and remove the eeh_ops member. While doing this, also correct: * The wait logic, so that it never waits longer than max_wait. * The wait logic, so that it never waits less than EEH_STATE_MIN_WAIT_TIME. * One call site where the result is treated like a bit field before it's checked for negative error values. * In pseries_eeh_get_state(), rename the "state" parameter to "delay" because that's what it is. Signed-off-by: Sam Bobroff <sbobroff@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2018-10-13powerpc/eeh: Cleanup eeh_enabled()Sam Bobroff
Signed-off-by: Sam Bobroff <sbobroff@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2018-10-13powerpc/eeh: Cleanup list_head field namesSam Bobroff
Instances of struct eeh_pe are placed in a tree structure using the fields "child_list" and "child", so place these next to each other in the definition. The field "child" is a list entry, so remove the unnecessary and misleading use of the list initializer, LIST_HEAD(), on it. The eeh_dev struct contains two list entry fields, called "list" and "rmv_list". Rename them to "entry" and "rmv_entry" and, as above, stop initializing them with LIST_HEAD(). Signed-off-by: Sam Bobroff <sbobroff@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2018-10-13powerpc/eeh: Cleanup unused field in eeh_devSam Bobroff
The 'bus' member of struct eeh_dev is assigned to once but never used, so remove it. Signed-off-by: Sam Bobroff <sbobroff@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2018-10-13powerpc/eeh: Cleanup EEH_POSTPONED_PROBESam Bobroff
Currently a flag, EEH_POSTPONED_PROBE, is used to prevent an incorrect message "EEH: No capable adapters found" from being displayed during the boot of powernv systems. It is necessary because, on powernv, the call to eeh_probe_devices() made from eeh_init() is too early and EEH can't yet be enabled. A second call is made later from eeh_pnv_post_init(), which succeeds. (On pseries, the first call succeeds because PCI devices are set up early enough and no second call is made.) This can be simplified by moving the early call to eeh_probe_devices() from eeh_init() (where it's seen by both platforms) to pSeries_final_fixup(), so that each platform only calls eeh_probe_devices() once, at a point where it can succeed. This is slightly later in the boot sequence, but but still early enough and it is now in the same place in the sequence for both platforms (the pcibios_fixup hook). The display of the message can be cleaned up as well, by moving it into eeh_probe_devices(). Signed-off-by: Sam Bobroff <sbobroff@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2018-07-02powerpc/eeh: Avoid misleading message "EEH: no capable adapters found"Mauro S. M. Rodrigues
Due to recent refactoring in EEH in: commit b9fde58db7e5 ("powerpc/powernv: Rework EEH initialization on powernv") a misleading message was seen in the kernel message buffer: [ 0.108431] EEH: PowerNV platform initialized [ 0.589979] EEH: No capable adapters found This happened due to the removal of the initialization delay for powernv platform. Even though the EEH infrastructure for the devices is eventually initialized and still works just fine the eeh device probe step is postponed in order to assure the PEs are created. Later pnv_eeh_post_init does the probe devices job but at that point the message was already shown right after eeh_init flow. This patch introduces a new flag EEH_POSTPONED_PROBE to represent that temporary state and avoid the message mentioned above and showing the follow one instead: [ 0.107724] EEH: PowerNV platform initialized [ 4.844825] EEH: PCI Enhanced I/O Error Handling Enabled Signed-off-by: Mauro S. M. Rodrigues <maurosr@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Acked-by: Russell Currey <ruscur@russell.cc> Tested-by:Venkat Rao B <vrbagal1@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2018-06-03powerpc/eeh: Introduce eeh_for_each_pe()Sam Bobroff
Add a for_each-style macro for iterating through PEs without the boilerplate required by a traversal function. eeh_pe_next() is now exported, as it is now used directly in place. Signed-off-by: Sam Bobroff <sbobroff@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2018-06-03powerpc/eeh: Strengthen types of eeh traversal functionsSam Bobroff
The traversal functions eeh_pe_traverse() and eeh_pe_dev_traverse() both provide their first argument as void * but every single user casts it to the expected type. Change the type of the first parameter from void * to the appropriate type, and clean up all uses. Signed-off-by: Sam Bobroff <sbobroff@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2018-03-27powerpc/eeh: Add eeh_state_active() helperSam Bobroff
Checking for a "fully active" device state requires testing two flag bits, which is open coded in several places, so add a function to do it. Signed-off-by: Sam Bobroff <sam.bobroff@au1.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2018-01-27powerpc/eeh: Add EEH operations to notify resumeBryant G. Ly
When pseries SR-IOV is enabled and after a PF driver has resumed from EEH, platform has to be notified of the event so the child VFs can be allowed to resume their normal recovery path. This patch makes the EEH operation allow unfreeze platform dependent code and adds the call to pseries EEH code. Signed-off-by: Bryant G. Ly <bryantly@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Juan J. Alvarez <jjalvare@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Acked-by: Russell Currey <ruscur@russell.cc> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2018-01-27powerpc/eeh: Update VF config space after EEHBryant G. Ly
Add EEH platform operations for pseries to update VF config space. With this change after EEH, the VF will have updated config space for pseries platform. Signed-off-by: Bryant G. Ly <bryantly@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Juan J. Alvarez <jjalvare@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Acked-by: Russell Currey <ruscur@russell.cc> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2017-11-06powerpc/eeh: Stop using do_gettimeofday()Arnd Bergmann
This interface is inefficient and deprecated because of the y2038 overflow. ktime_get_seconds() is an appropriate replacement here, since it has sufficient granularity but is more efficient and uses monotonic time. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Reviewed-by: Andrew Donnellan <andrew.donnellan@au1.ibm.com> Acked-by: Russell Currey <ruscur@russell.cc> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
2017-09-26powerpc/powernv: Rework EEH initialization on powernvBenjamin Herrenschmidt
Remove the post_init callback which is only used by powernv, we can just call it explicitly from the powernv code. This partially kills the ability to "disable" eeh at runtime via debugfs as this was calling that same callback again, but this is both unused and broken in several ways. If we want to revive it, we need to create a dedicated enable/disable callback on the backend that does the right thing. Let the bulk of eeh initialize normally at core_initcall() like it does on pseries by removing the hack in eeh_init() that delays it. Instead we make sure our eeh->probe cleanly bails out of the PEs haven't been created yet and we force a re-probe where we used to call eeh_init() again. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Acked-by: Russell Currey <ruscur@russell.cc> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>