diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/sched/core.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/sched/core.c | 38 |
1 files changed, 34 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c index 0869b20fba81..e053c31d96da 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/core.c +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c @@ -951,8 +951,13 @@ struct migration_arg { static struct rq *__migrate_task(struct rq *rq, struct rq_flags *rf, struct task_struct *p, int dest_cpu) { - if (unlikely(!cpu_active(dest_cpu))) - return rq; + if (p->flags & PF_KTHREAD) { + if (unlikely(!cpu_online(dest_cpu))) + return rq; + } else { + if (unlikely(!cpu_active(dest_cpu))) + return rq; + } /* Affinity changed (again). */ if (!cpumask_test_cpu(dest_cpu, &p->cpus_allowed)) @@ -2635,6 +2640,16 @@ static struct rq *finish_task_switch(struct task_struct *prev) prev_state = prev->state; vtime_task_switch(prev); perf_event_task_sched_in(prev, current); + /* + * The membarrier system call requires a full memory barrier + * after storing to rq->curr, before going back to user-space. + * + * TODO: This smp_mb__after_unlock_lock can go away if PPC end + * up adding a full barrier to switch_mm(), or we should figure + * out if a smp_mb__after_unlock_lock is really the proper API + * to use. + */ + smp_mb__after_unlock_lock(); finish_lock_switch(rq, prev); finish_arch_post_lock_switch(); @@ -3324,6 +3339,21 @@ static void __sched notrace __schedule(bool preempt) if (likely(prev != next)) { rq->nr_switches++; rq->curr = next; + /* + * The membarrier system call requires each architecture + * to have a full memory barrier after updating + * rq->curr, before returning to user-space. For TSO + * (e.g. x86), the architecture must provide its own + * barrier in switch_mm(). For weakly ordered machines + * for which spin_unlock() acts as a full memory + * barrier, finish_lock_switch() in common code takes + * care of this barrier. For weakly ordered machines for + * which spin_unlock() acts as a RELEASE barrier (only + * arm64 and PowerPC), arm64 has a full barrier in + * switch_to(), and PowerPC has + * smp_mb__after_unlock_lock() before + * finish_lock_switch(). + */ ++*switch_count; trace_sched_switch(preempt, prev, next); @@ -3352,8 +3382,8 @@ void __noreturn do_task_dead(void) * To avoid it, we have to wait for releasing tsk->pi_lock which * is held by try_to_wake_up() */ - smp_mb(); - raw_spin_unlock_wait(¤t->pi_lock); + raw_spin_lock_irq(¤t->pi_lock); + raw_spin_unlock_irq(¤t->pi_lock); /* Causes final put_task_struct in finish_task_switch(): */ __set_current_state(TASK_DEAD); |