summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/Documentation
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation')
-rw-r--r--Documentation/acpi/method-customizing.txt5
-rw-r--r--Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt36
2 files changed, 41 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/acpi/method-customizing.txt b/Documentation/acpi/method-customizing.txt
index 3e1d25aee3fb..5f55373dd53b 100644
--- a/Documentation/acpi/method-customizing.txt
+++ b/Documentation/acpi/method-customizing.txt
@@ -66,3 +66,8 @@ Note: We can use a kernel with multiple custom ACPI method running,
But each individual write to debugfs can implement a SINGLE
method override. i.e. if we want to insert/override multiple
ACPI methods, we need to redo step c) ~ g) for multiple times.
+
+Note: Be aware that root can mis-use this driver to modify arbitrary
+ memory and gain additional rights, if root's privileges got
+ restricted (for example if root is not allowed to load additional
+ modules after boot).
diff --git a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
index ff31b1cc50aa..1a9446b59153 100644
--- a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
+++ b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
@@ -6,6 +6,42 @@ be removed from this file.
---------------------------
+What: x86 floppy disable_hlt
+When: 2012
+Why: ancient workaround of dubious utility clutters the
+ code used by everybody else.
+Who: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
+
+---------------------------
+
+What: CONFIG_APM_CPU_IDLE, and its ability to call APM BIOS in idle
+When: 2012
+Why: This optional sub-feature of APM is of dubious reliability,
+ and ancient APM laptops are likely better served by calling HLT.
+ Deleting CONFIG_APM_CPU_IDLE allows x86 to stop exporting
+ the pm_idle function pointer to modules.
+Who: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
+
+----------------------------
+
+What: x86_32 "no-hlt" cmdline param
+When: 2012
+Why: remove a branch from idle path, simplify code used by everybody.
+ This option disabled the use of HLT in idle and machine_halt()
+ for hardware that was flakey 15-years ago. Today we have
+ "idle=poll" that removed HLT from idle, and so if such a machine
+ is still running the upstream kernel, "idle=poll" is likely sufficient.
+Who: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
+
+----------------------------
+
+What: x86 "idle=mwait" cmdline param
+When: 2012
+Why: simplify x86 idle code
+Who: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
+
+----------------------------
+
What: PRISM54
When: 2.6.34