diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | include/linux/compiler.h | 25 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/locking/qspinlock.c | 12 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/sched/core.c | 8 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/sched/sched.h | 2 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/smp.c | 2 |
5 files changed, 31 insertions, 18 deletions
diff --git a/include/linux/compiler.h b/include/linux/compiler.h index 06f27fd9d760..2bcaedc0f032 100644 --- a/include/linux/compiler.h +++ b/include/linux/compiler.h @@ -305,21 +305,34 @@ static __always_inline void __write_once_size(volatile void *p, void *res, int s }) /** - * smp_cond_acquire() - Spin wait for cond with ACQUIRE ordering + * smp_cond_load_acquire() - (Spin) wait for cond with ACQUIRE ordering + * @ptr: pointer to the variable to wait on * @cond: boolean expression to wait for * * Equivalent to using smp_load_acquire() on the condition variable but employs * the control dependency of the wait to reduce the barrier on many platforms. * + * Due to C lacking lambda expressions we load the value of *ptr into a + * pre-named variable @VAL to be used in @cond. + * * The control dependency provides a LOAD->STORE order, the additional RMB * provides LOAD->LOAD order, together they provide LOAD->{LOAD,STORE} order, * aka. ACQUIRE. */ -#define smp_cond_acquire(cond) do { \ - while (!(cond)) \ - cpu_relax(); \ - smp_rmb(); /* ctrl + rmb := acquire */ \ -} while (0) +#ifndef smp_cond_load_acquire +#define smp_cond_load_acquire(ptr, cond_expr) ({ \ + typeof(ptr) __PTR = (ptr); \ + typeof(*ptr) VAL; \ + for (;;) { \ + VAL = READ_ONCE(*__PTR); \ + if (cond_expr) \ + break; \ + cpu_relax(); \ + } \ + smp_rmb(); /* ctrl + rmb := acquire */ \ + VAL; \ +}) +#endif #endif /* __KERNEL__ */ diff --git a/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c b/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c index 2f9153b183c9..1b8dda90ebfa 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c +++ b/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c @@ -475,7 +475,7 @@ void queued_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val) * sequentiality; this is because not all clear_pending_set_locked() * implementations imply full barriers. */ - smp_cond_acquire(!(atomic_read(&lock->val) & _Q_LOCKED_MASK)); + smp_cond_load_acquire(&lock->val.counter, !(VAL & _Q_LOCKED_MASK)); /* * take ownership and clear the pending bit. @@ -562,7 +562,7 @@ queue: * * The PV pv_wait_head_or_lock function, if active, will acquire * the lock and return a non-zero value. So we have to skip the - * smp_cond_acquire() call. As the next PV queue head hasn't been + * smp_cond_load_acquire() call. As the next PV queue head hasn't been * designated yet, there is no way for the locked value to become * _Q_SLOW_VAL. So both the set_locked() and the * atomic_cmpxchg_relaxed() calls will be safe. @@ -573,7 +573,7 @@ queue: if ((val = pv_wait_head_or_lock(lock, node))) goto locked; - smp_cond_acquire(!((val = atomic_read(&lock->val)) & _Q_LOCKED_PENDING_MASK)); + val = smp_cond_load_acquire(&lock->val.counter, !(VAL & _Q_LOCKED_PENDING_MASK)); locked: /* @@ -593,9 +593,9 @@ locked: break; } /* - * The smp_cond_acquire() call above has provided the necessary - * acquire semantics required for locking. At most two - * iterations of this loop may be ran. + * The smp_cond_load_acquire() call above has provided the + * necessary acquire semantics required for locking. At most + * two iterations of this loop may be ran. */ old = atomic_cmpxchg_relaxed(&lock->val, val, _Q_LOCKED_VAL); if (old == val) diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c index 017d5394f5dc..5cd6931cb2cb 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/core.c +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c @@ -1935,7 +1935,7 @@ static void ttwu_queue(struct task_struct *p, int cpu, int wake_flags) * chain to provide order. Instead we do: * * 1) smp_store_release(X->on_cpu, 0) - * 2) smp_cond_acquire(!X->on_cpu) + * 2) smp_cond_load_acquire(!X->on_cpu) * * Example: * @@ -1946,7 +1946,7 @@ static void ttwu_queue(struct task_struct *p, int cpu, int wake_flags) * sched-out X * smp_store_release(X->on_cpu, 0); * - * smp_cond_acquire(!X->on_cpu); + * smp_cond_load_acquire(&X->on_cpu, !VAL); * X->state = WAKING * set_task_cpu(X,2) * @@ -1972,7 +1972,7 @@ static void ttwu_queue(struct task_struct *p, int cpu, int wake_flags) * This means that any means of doing remote wakeups must order the CPU doing * the wakeup against the CPU the task is going to end up running on. This, * however, is already required for the regular Program-Order guarantee above, - * since the waking CPU is the one issueing the ACQUIRE (smp_cond_acquire). + * since the waking CPU is the one issueing the ACQUIRE (smp_cond_load_acquire). * */ @@ -2045,7 +2045,7 @@ try_to_wake_up(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int state, int wake_flags) * This ensures that tasks getting woken will be fully ordered against * their previous state and preserve Program Order. */ - smp_cond_acquire(!p->on_cpu); + smp_cond_load_acquire(&p->on_cpu, !VAL); p->sched_contributes_to_load = !!task_contributes_to_load(p); p->state = TASK_WAKING; diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h index 72f1f3087b04..425bf5ddaa5a 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h @@ -1113,7 +1113,7 @@ static inline void finish_lock_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev) * In particular, the load of prev->state in finish_task_switch() must * happen before this. * - * Pairs with the smp_cond_acquire() in try_to_wake_up(). + * Pairs with the smp_cond_load_acquire() in try_to_wake_up(). */ smp_store_release(&prev->on_cpu, 0); #endif diff --git a/kernel/smp.c b/kernel/smp.c index 74165443c240..36552beed397 100644 --- a/kernel/smp.c +++ b/kernel/smp.c @@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ void __init call_function_init(void) */ static __always_inline void csd_lock_wait(struct call_single_data *csd) { - smp_cond_acquire(!(csd->flags & CSD_FLAG_LOCK)); + smp_cond_load_acquire(&csd->flags, !(VAL & CSD_FLAG_LOCK)); } static __always_inline void csd_lock(struct call_single_data *csd) |