diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | fs/dlm/Kconfig | 2 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | fs/dlm/dlm_internal.h | 1 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | fs/dlm/lock.c | 16 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | fs/dlm/lowcomms.c | 5 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | fs/dlm/recover.c | 37 |
5 files changed, 47 insertions, 14 deletions
diff --git a/fs/dlm/Kconfig b/fs/dlm/Kconfig index 1897eb1b4b6a..e4242c3f8486 100644 --- a/fs/dlm/Kconfig +++ b/fs/dlm/Kconfig @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ menuconfig DLM tristate "Distributed Lock Manager (DLM)" - depends on EXPERIMENTAL && INET + depends on INET depends on SYSFS && CONFIGFS_FS && (IPV6 || IPV6=n) select IP_SCTP help diff --git a/fs/dlm/dlm_internal.h b/fs/dlm/dlm_internal.h index 871c1abf6029..77c0f70f8fe8 100644 --- a/fs/dlm/dlm_internal.h +++ b/fs/dlm/dlm_internal.h @@ -337,6 +337,7 @@ enum rsb_flags { RSB_NEW_MASTER2, RSB_RECOVER_CONVERT, RSB_RECOVER_GRANT, + RSB_RECOVER_LVB_INVAL, }; static inline void rsb_set_flag(struct dlm_rsb *r, enum rsb_flags flag) diff --git a/fs/dlm/lock.c b/fs/dlm/lock.c index b56950758188..a579f30f237d 100644 --- a/fs/dlm/lock.c +++ b/fs/dlm/lock.c @@ -5393,6 +5393,13 @@ static void purge_dead_list(struct dlm_ls *ls, struct dlm_rsb *r, if ((lkb->lkb_nodeid == nodeid_gone) || dlm_is_removed(ls, lkb->lkb_nodeid)) { + /* tell recover_lvb to invalidate the lvb + because a node holding EX/PW failed */ + if ((lkb->lkb_exflags & DLM_LKF_VALBLK) && + (lkb->lkb_grmode >= DLM_LOCK_PW)) { + rsb_set_flag(r, RSB_RECOVER_LVB_INVAL); + } + del_lkb(r, lkb); /* this put should free the lkb */ @@ -6025,15 +6032,18 @@ static int orphan_proc_lock(struct dlm_ls *ls, struct dlm_lkb *lkb) return error; } -/* The force flag allows the unlock to go ahead even if the lkb isn't granted. - Regardless of what rsb queue the lock is on, it's removed and freed. */ +/* The FORCEUNLOCK flag allows the unlock to go ahead even if the lkb isn't + granted. Regardless of what rsb queue the lock is on, it's removed and + freed. The IVVALBLK flag causes the lvb on the resource to be invalidated + if our lock is PW/EX (it's ignored if our granted mode is smaller.) */ static int unlock_proc_lock(struct dlm_ls *ls, struct dlm_lkb *lkb) { struct dlm_args args; int error; - set_unlock_args(DLM_LKF_FORCEUNLOCK, lkb->lkb_ua, &args); + set_unlock_args(DLM_LKF_FORCEUNLOCK | DLM_LKF_IVVALBLK, + lkb->lkb_ua, &args); error = unlock_lock(ls, lkb, &args); if (error == -DLM_EUNLOCK) diff --git a/fs/dlm/lowcomms.c b/fs/dlm/lowcomms.c index 331ea4f94efd..dd87a31bcc21 100644 --- a/fs/dlm/lowcomms.c +++ b/fs/dlm/lowcomms.c @@ -1385,7 +1385,6 @@ void *dlm_lowcomms_get_buffer(int nodeid, int len, gfp_t allocation, char **ppc) struct connection *con; struct writequeue_entry *e; int offset = 0; - int users = 0; con = nodeid2con(nodeid, allocation); if (!con) @@ -1399,7 +1398,7 @@ void *dlm_lowcomms_get_buffer(int nodeid, int len, gfp_t allocation, char **ppc) } else { offset = e->end; e->end += len; - users = e->users++; + e->users++; } spin_unlock(&con->writequeue_lock); @@ -1414,7 +1413,7 @@ void *dlm_lowcomms_get_buffer(int nodeid, int len, gfp_t allocation, char **ppc) spin_lock(&con->writequeue_lock); offset = e->end; e->end += len; - users = e->users++; + e->users++; list_add_tail(&e->list, &con->writequeue); spin_unlock(&con->writequeue_lock); goto got_one; diff --git a/fs/dlm/recover.c b/fs/dlm/recover.c index 4a7a76e42fc3..aedea28a86a1 100644 --- a/fs/dlm/recover.c +++ b/fs/dlm/recover.c @@ -717,8 +717,14 @@ void dlm_recovered_lock(struct dlm_rsb *r) * the VALNOTVALID flag if necessary, and determining the correct lvb contents * based on the lvb's of the locks held on the rsb. * - * RSB_VALNOTVALID is set if there are only NL/CR locks on the rsb. If it - * was already set prior to recovery, it's not cleared, regardless of locks. + * RSB_VALNOTVALID is set in two cases: + * + * 1. we are master, but not new, and we purged an EX/PW lock held by a + * failed node (in dlm_recover_purge which set RSB_RECOVER_LVB_INVAL) + * + * 2. we are a new master, and there are only NL/CR locks left. + * (We could probably improve this by only invaliding in this way when + * the previous master left uncleanly. VMS docs mention that.) * * The LVB contents are only considered for changing when this is a new master * of the rsb (NEW_MASTER2). Then, the rsb's lvb is taken from any lkb with @@ -734,6 +740,19 @@ static void recover_lvb(struct dlm_rsb *r) int big_lock_exists = 0; int lvblen = r->res_ls->ls_lvblen; + if (!rsb_flag(r, RSB_NEW_MASTER2) && + rsb_flag(r, RSB_RECOVER_LVB_INVAL)) { + /* case 1 above */ + rsb_set_flag(r, RSB_VALNOTVALID); + return; + } + + if (!rsb_flag(r, RSB_NEW_MASTER2)) + return; + + /* we are the new master, so figure out if VALNOTVALID should + be set, and set the rsb lvb from the best lkb available. */ + list_for_each_entry(lkb, &r->res_grantqueue, lkb_statequeue) { if (!(lkb->lkb_exflags & DLM_LKF_VALBLK)) continue; @@ -772,13 +791,10 @@ static void recover_lvb(struct dlm_rsb *r) if (!lock_lvb_exists) goto out; + /* lvb is invalidated if only NL/CR locks remain */ if (!big_lock_exists) rsb_set_flag(r, RSB_VALNOTVALID); - /* don't mess with the lvb unless we're the new master */ - if (!rsb_flag(r, RSB_NEW_MASTER2)) - goto out; - if (!r->res_lvbptr) { r->res_lvbptr = dlm_allocate_lvb(r->res_ls); if (!r->res_lvbptr) @@ -852,12 +868,19 @@ void dlm_recover_rsbs(struct dlm_ls *ls) if (is_master(r)) { if (rsb_flag(r, RSB_RECOVER_CONVERT)) recover_conversion(r); + + /* recover lvb before granting locks so the updated + lvb/VALNOTVALID is presented in the completion */ + recover_lvb(r); + if (rsb_flag(r, RSB_NEW_MASTER2)) recover_grant(r); - recover_lvb(r); count++; + } else { + rsb_clear_flag(r, RSB_VALNOTVALID); } rsb_clear_flag(r, RSB_RECOVER_CONVERT); + rsb_clear_flag(r, RSB_RECOVER_LVB_INVAL); rsb_clear_flag(r, RSB_NEW_MASTER2); unlock_rsb(r); } |