diff options
author | David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com> | 2021-08-04 22:28:40 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> | 2021-08-06 07:52:29 -0400 |
commit | fe22ed827c5b60b895b15c5c3f04e04ac606be38 (patch) | |
tree | e53cb7787c35face88d10895d54307d72724bdae /virt/kvm | |
parent | 0f22af940dc8ec4f437189096a5f8677995323b0 (diff) |
KVM: Cache the last used slot index per vCPU
The memslot for a given gfn is looked up multiple times during page
fault handling. Avoid binary searching for it multiple times by caching
the most recently used slot. There is an existing VM-wide last_used_slot
but that does not work well for cases where vCPUs are accessing memory
in different slots (see performance data below).
Another benefit of caching the most recently use slot (versus looking
up the slot once and passing around a pointer) is speeding up memslot
lookups *across* faults and during spte prefetching.
To measure the performance of this change I ran dirty_log_perf_test with
64 vCPUs and 64 memslots and measured "Populate memory time" and
"Iteration 2 dirty memory time". Tests were ran with eptad=N to force
dirty logging to use fast_page_fault so its performance could be
measured.
Config | Metric | Before | After
---------- | ----------------------------- | ------ | ------
tdp_mmu=Y | Populate memory time | 6.76s | 5.47s
tdp_mmu=Y | Iteration 2 dirty memory time | 2.83s | 0.31s
tdp_mmu=N | Populate memory time | 20.4s | 18.7s
tdp_mmu=N | Iteration 2 dirty memory time | 2.65s | 0.30s
The "Iteration 2 dirty memory time" results are especially compelling
because they are equivalent to running the same test with a single
memslot. In other words, fast_page_fault performance no longer scales
with the number of memslots.
Signed-off-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
Message-Id: <20210804222844.1419481-4-dmatlack@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'virt/kvm')
-rw-r--r-- | virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 22 |
1 files changed, 21 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c index 1984c7389787..30d322519253 100644 --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c @@ -415,6 +415,7 @@ static void kvm_vcpu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm *kvm, unsigned id) vcpu->preempted = false; vcpu->ready = false; preempt_notifier_init(&vcpu->preempt_notifier, &kvm_preempt_ops); + vcpu->last_used_slot = 0; } void kvm_vcpu_destroy(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) @@ -2025,7 +2026,26 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gfn_to_memslot); struct kvm_memory_slot *kvm_vcpu_gfn_to_memslot(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gfn_t gfn) { - return __gfn_to_memslot(kvm_vcpu_memslots(vcpu), gfn); + struct kvm_memslots *slots = kvm_vcpu_memslots(vcpu); + struct kvm_memory_slot *slot; + int slot_index; + + slot = try_get_memslot(slots, vcpu->last_used_slot, gfn); + if (slot) + return slot; + + /* + * Fall back to searching all memslots. We purposely use + * search_memslots() instead of __gfn_to_memslot() to avoid + * thrashing the VM-wide last_used_index in kvm_memslots. + */ + slot = search_memslots(slots, gfn, &slot_index); + if (slot) { + vcpu->last_used_slot = slot_index; + return slot; + } + + return NULL; } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_vcpu_gfn_to_memslot); |