diff options
author | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2020-12-16 11:01:04 -0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2020-12-16 11:01:04 -0800 |
commit | ca5b877b6ccc7b989614f3f541e9a1fe2ff7f75a (patch) | |
tree | f8a1e8e664e8d9fc186b507a6733c5281cdd002e /security/security.c | |
parent | 3d5de2ddc6ba924d7c10460a1dc3aae8786b9d52 (diff) | |
parent | 3df98d79215ace13d1e91ddfc5a67a0f5acbd83f (diff) |
Merge tag 'selinux-pr-20201214' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pcmoore/selinux
Pull selinux updates from Paul Moore:
"While we have a small number of SELinux patches for v5.11, there are a
few changes worth highlighting:
- Change the LSM network hooks to pass flowi_common structs instead
of the parent flowi struct as the LSMs do not currently need the
full flowi struct and they do not have enough information to use it
safely (missing information on the address family).
This patch was discussed both with Herbert Xu (representing team
netdev) and James Morris (representing team
LSMs-other-than-SELinux).
- Fix how we handle errors in inode_doinit_with_dentry() so that we
attempt to properly label the inode on following lookups instead of
continuing to treat it as unlabeled.
- Tweak the kernel logic around allowx, auditallowx, and dontauditx
SELinux policy statements such that the auditx/dontauditx are
effective even without the allowx statement.
Everything passes our test suite"
* tag 'selinux-pr-20201214' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pcmoore/selinux:
lsm,selinux: pass flowi_common instead of flowi to the LSM hooks
selinux: Fix fall-through warnings for Clang
selinux: drop super_block backpointer from superblock_security_struct
selinux: fix inode_doinit_with_dentry() LABEL_INVALID error handling
selinux: allow dontauditx and auditallowx rules to take effect without allowx
selinux: fix error initialization in inode_doinit_with_dentry()
Diffstat (limited to 'security/security.c')
-rw-r--r-- | security/security.c | 17 |
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c index fe33c0af264f..7b09cfbae94f 100644 --- a/security/security.c +++ b/security/security.c @@ -2208,15 +2208,16 @@ void security_sk_clone(const struct sock *sk, struct sock *newsk) } EXPORT_SYMBOL(security_sk_clone); -void security_sk_classify_flow(struct sock *sk, struct flowi *fl) +void security_sk_classify_flow(struct sock *sk, struct flowi_common *flic) { - call_void_hook(sk_getsecid, sk, &fl->flowi_secid); + call_void_hook(sk_getsecid, sk, &flic->flowic_secid); } EXPORT_SYMBOL(security_sk_classify_flow); -void security_req_classify_flow(const struct request_sock *req, struct flowi *fl) +void security_req_classify_flow(const struct request_sock *req, + struct flowi_common *flic) { - call_void_hook(req_classify_flow, req, fl); + call_void_hook(req_classify_flow, req, flic); } EXPORT_SYMBOL(security_req_classify_flow); @@ -2408,7 +2409,7 @@ int security_xfrm_policy_lookup(struct xfrm_sec_ctx *ctx, u32 fl_secid, u8 dir) int security_xfrm_state_pol_flow_match(struct xfrm_state *x, struct xfrm_policy *xp, - const struct flowi *fl) + const struct flowi_common *flic) { struct security_hook_list *hp; int rc = LSM_RET_DEFAULT(xfrm_state_pol_flow_match); @@ -2424,7 +2425,7 @@ int security_xfrm_state_pol_flow_match(struct xfrm_state *x, */ hlist_for_each_entry(hp, &security_hook_heads.xfrm_state_pol_flow_match, list) { - rc = hp->hook.xfrm_state_pol_flow_match(x, xp, fl); + rc = hp->hook.xfrm_state_pol_flow_match(x, xp, flic); break; } return rc; @@ -2435,9 +2436,9 @@ int security_xfrm_decode_session(struct sk_buff *skb, u32 *secid) return call_int_hook(xfrm_decode_session, 0, skb, secid, 1); } -void security_skb_classify_flow(struct sk_buff *skb, struct flowi *fl) +void security_skb_classify_flow(struct sk_buff *skb, struct flowi_common *flic) { - int rc = call_int_hook(xfrm_decode_session, 0, skb, &fl->flowi_secid, + int rc = call_int_hook(xfrm_decode_session, 0, skb, &flic->flowic_secid, 0); BUG_ON(rc); |