summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/scripts
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2020-08-03 13:58:10 -0700
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2020-08-03 13:58:10 -0700
commit45365a06aa305c9eca1cbf48aef48a7a0cea3b4e (patch)
treeaa3e1cdbe77aab1ac5f16cbaaa8ed9147df82efe /scripts
parentcdc8fcb49905c0b67e355e027cb462ee168ffaa3 (diff)
parent9a996c67a65d937b23408e56935ef23404c9418e (diff)
Merge tag 's390-5.9-1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/s390/linux
Pull s390 updates from Heiko Carstens: - Add support for function error injection. - Add support for custom exception handlers, as required by BPF_PROBE_MEM. - Add support for BPF_PROBE_MEM. - Add trace events for idle enter / exit for the s390 specific idle implementation. - Remove unused zcore memmmap device. - Remove unused "raw view" from s390 debug feature. - AP bus + zcrypt device driver code refactoring. - Provide cex4 cca sysfs attributes for cex3 for zcrypt device driver. - Expose only minimal interface to walk physmem for mm/memblock. This is a common code change and it has been agreed on with Mike Rapoport and Andrew Morton that this can go upstream via the s390 tree. - Rework of the s390 vmem/vmmemap code to allow for future memory hot remove. - Get rid of FORCE_MAX_ZONEORDER to finally allow for order-10 allocations again, instead of only order-8 allocations. - Various small improvements and fixes. * tag 's390-5.9-1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/s390/linux: (48 commits) s390/vmemmap: coding style updates s390/vmemmap: avoid memset(PAGE_UNUSED) when adding consecutive sections s390/vmemmap: remember unused sub-pmd ranges s390/vmemmap: fallback to PTEs if mapping large PMD fails s390/vmem: cleanup empty page tables s390/vmemmap: take the vmem_mutex when populating/freeing s390/vmemmap: cleanup when vmemmap_populate() fails s390/vmemmap: extend modify_pagetable() to handle vmemmap s390/vmem: consolidate vmem_add_range() and vmem_remove_range() s390/vmem: rename vmem_add_mem() to vmem_add_range() s390: enable HAVE_FUNCTION_ERROR_INJECTION s390/pci: clarify comment in s390_mmio_read/write s390/time: improve comparison for tod steering s390/time: select CLOCKSOURCE_VALIDATE_LAST_CYCLE s390/time: use CLOCKSOURCE_MASK s390/bpf: implement BPF_PROBE_MEM s390/kernel: expand exception table logic to allow new handling options s390/kernel: unify EX_TABLE* implementations s390/mm: allow order 10 allocations s390/mm: avoid trimming to MAX_ORDER ...
Diffstat (limited to 'scripts')
-rw-r--r--scripts/sorttable.c41
1 files changed, 41 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/scripts/sorttable.c b/scripts/sorttable.c
index ec6b5e81eba1..0ef3abfc4a51 100644
--- a/scripts/sorttable.c
+++ b/scripts/sorttable.c
@@ -255,6 +255,45 @@ static void x86_sort_relative_table(char *extab_image, int image_size)
}
}
+static void s390_sort_relative_table(char *extab_image, int image_size)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < image_size; i += 16) {
+ char *loc = extab_image + i;
+ uint64_t handler;
+
+ w(r((uint32_t *)loc) + i, (uint32_t *)loc);
+ w(r((uint32_t *)(loc + 4)) + (i + 4), (uint32_t *)(loc + 4));
+ /*
+ * 0 is a special self-relative handler value, which means that
+ * handler should be ignored. It is safe, because it means that
+ * handler field points to itself, which should never happen.
+ * When creating extable-relative values, keep it as 0, since
+ * this should never occur either: it would mean that handler
+ * field points to the first extable entry.
+ */
+ handler = r8((uint64_t *)(loc + 8));
+ if (handler)
+ handler += i + 8;
+ w8(handler, (uint64_t *)(loc + 8));
+ }
+
+ qsort(extab_image, image_size / 16, 16, compare_relative_table);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < image_size; i += 16) {
+ char *loc = extab_image + i;
+ uint64_t handler;
+
+ w(r((uint32_t *)loc) - i, (uint32_t *)loc);
+ w(r((uint32_t *)(loc + 4)) - (i + 4), (uint32_t *)(loc + 4));
+ handler = r8((uint64_t *)(loc + 8));
+ if (handler)
+ handler -= i + 8;
+ w8(handler, (uint64_t *)(loc + 8));
+ }
+}
+
static int do_file(char const *const fname, void *addr)
{
int rc = -1;
@@ -297,6 +336,8 @@ static int do_file(char const *const fname, void *addr)
custom_sort = x86_sort_relative_table;
break;
case EM_S390:
+ custom_sort = s390_sort_relative_table;
+ break;
case EM_AARCH64:
case EM_PARISC:
case EM_PPC: