diff options
author | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2019-01-12 10:52:40 -0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2019-01-12 10:52:40 -0800 |
commit | 66c56cfa64d9dbb9efa8a06c1aece77e8d57ea19 (patch) | |
tree | c645a58e97925f7f97dcc5bed2082ead5f2b5d89 /scripts | |
parent | 473348891c36ff6de3e224fefa0b3fc86a629178 (diff) | |
parent | dfd32cad146e3624970eee9329e99d2c6ef751b3 (diff) |
Merge tag 'remove-dma_zalloc_coherent-5.0' of git://git.infradead.org/users/hch/dma-mapping
Pull dma_zalloc_coherent() removal from Christoph Hellwig:
"We've always had a weird situation around dma_zalloc_coherent. To
safely support mapping the allocations to userspace major
architectures like x86 and arm have always zeroed allocations from
dma_alloc_coherent, but a couple other architectures were missing that
zeroing either always or in corner cases.
Then later we grew anothe dma_zalloc_coherent interface to explicitly
request zeroing, but that just added __GFP_ZERO to the allocation
flags, which for some allocators that didn't end up using the page
allocator ended up being a no-op and still not zeroing the
allocations.
So for this merge window I fixed up all remaining architectures to
zero the memory in dma_alloc_coherent, and made dma_zalloc_coherent a
no-op wrapper around dma_alloc_coherent, which fixes all of the above
issues.
dma_zalloc_coherent is now pointless and can go away, and Luis helped
me writing a cocchinelle script and patch series to kill it, which I
think we should apply now just after -rc1 to finally settle these
issue"
* tag 'remove-dma_zalloc_coherent-5.0' of git://git.infradead.org/users/hch/dma-mapping:
dma-mapping: remove dma_zalloc_coherent()
cross-tree: phase out dma_zalloc_coherent() on headers
cross-tree: phase out dma_zalloc_coherent()
Diffstat (limited to 'scripts')
-rw-r--r-- | scripts/coccinelle/api/alloc/alloc_cast.cocci | 8 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | scripts/coccinelle/api/alloc/zalloc-simple.cocci | 11 |
2 files changed, 5 insertions, 14 deletions
diff --git a/scripts/coccinelle/api/alloc/alloc_cast.cocci b/scripts/coccinelle/api/alloc/alloc_cast.cocci index 408ee3879f9b..18fedf7c60ed 100644 --- a/scripts/coccinelle/api/alloc/alloc_cast.cocci +++ b/scripts/coccinelle/api/alloc/alloc_cast.cocci @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ type T; (T *) \(kmalloc\|kzalloc\|kcalloc\|kmem_cache_alloc\|kmem_cache_zalloc\| kmem_cache_alloc_node\|kmalloc_node\|kzalloc_node\|vmalloc\|vzalloc\| - dma_alloc_coherent\|dma_zalloc_coherent\|devm_kmalloc\|devm_kzalloc\| + dma_alloc_coherent\|devm_kmalloc\|devm_kzalloc\| kvmalloc\|kvzalloc\|kvmalloc_node\|kvzalloc_node\|pci_alloc_consistent\| pci_zalloc_consistent\|kmem_alloc\|kmem_zalloc\|kmem_zone_alloc\| kmem_zone_zalloc\|vmalloc_node\|vzalloc_node\)(...) @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ type r1.T; * (T *) \(kmalloc\|kzalloc\|kcalloc\|kmem_cache_alloc\|kmem_cache_zalloc\| kmem_cache_alloc_node\|kmalloc_node\|kzalloc_node\|vmalloc\|vzalloc\| - dma_alloc_coherent\|dma_zalloc_coherent\|devm_kmalloc\|devm_kzalloc\| + dma_alloc_coherent\|devm_kmalloc\|devm_kzalloc\| kvmalloc\|kvzalloc\|kvmalloc_node\|kvzalloc_node\|pci_alloc_consistent\| pci_zalloc_consistent\|kmem_alloc\|kmem_zalloc\|kmem_zone_alloc\| kmem_zone_zalloc\|vmalloc_node\|vzalloc_node\)(...) @@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ type r1.T; - (T *) \(kmalloc\|kzalloc\|kcalloc\|kmem_cache_alloc\|kmem_cache_zalloc\| kmem_cache_alloc_node\|kmalloc_node\|kzalloc_node\|vmalloc\|vzalloc\| - dma_alloc_coherent\|dma_zalloc_coherent\|devm_kmalloc\|devm_kzalloc\| + dma_alloc_coherent\|devm_kmalloc\|devm_kzalloc\| kvmalloc\|kvzalloc\|kvmalloc_node\|kvzalloc_node\|pci_alloc_consistent\| pci_zalloc_consistent\|kmem_alloc\|kmem_zalloc\|kmem_zone_alloc\| kmem_zone_zalloc\|vmalloc_node\|vzalloc_node\)(...) @@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ position p; (T@p *) \(kmalloc\|kzalloc\|kcalloc\|kmem_cache_alloc\|kmem_cache_zalloc\| kmem_cache_alloc_node\|kmalloc_node\|kzalloc_node\|vmalloc\|vzalloc\| - dma_alloc_coherent\|dma_zalloc_coherent\|devm_kmalloc\|devm_kzalloc\| + dma_alloc_coherent\|devm_kmalloc\|devm_kzalloc\| kvmalloc\|kvzalloc\|kvmalloc_node\|kvzalloc_node\|pci_alloc_consistent\| pci_zalloc_consistent\|kmem_alloc\|kmem_zalloc\|kmem_zone_alloc\| kmem_zone_zalloc\|vmalloc_node\|vzalloc_node\)(...) diff --git a/scripts/coccinelle/api/alloc/zalloc-simple.cocci b/scripts/coccinelle/api/alloc/zalloc-simple.cocci index d819275b7fde..5cd1991c582e 100644 --- a/scripts/coccinelle/api/alloc/zalloc-simple.cocci +++ b/scripts/coccinelle/api/alloc/zalloc-simple.cocci @@ -69,15 +69,6 @@ statement S; - x = (T)vmalloc(E1); + x = (T)vzalloc(E1); | -- x = dma_alloc_coherent(E2,E1,E3,E4); -+ x = dma_zalloc_coherent(E2,E1,E3,E4); -| -- x = (T *)dma_alloc_coherent(E2,E1,E3,E4); -+ x = dma_zalloc_coherent(E2,E1,E3,E4); -| -- x = (T)dma_alloc_coherent(E2,E1,E3,E4); -+ x = (T)dma_zalloc_coherent(E2,E1,E3,E4); -| - x = kmalloc_node(E1,E2,E3); + x = kzalloc_node(E1,E2,E3); | @@ -225,7 +216,7 @@ p << r2.p; x << r2.x; @@ -msg="WARNING: dma_zalloc_coherent should be used for %s, instead of dma_alloc_coherent/memset" % (x) +msg="WARNING: dma_alloc_coherent use in %s already zeroes out memory, so memset is not needed" % (x) coccilib.report.print_report(p[0], msg) //----------------------------------------------------------------- |