diff options
author | Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> | 2010-04-29 11:01:49 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2010-05-01 15:00:15 -0700 |
commit | 43815482370c510c569fd18edb57afcb0fa8cab6 (patch) | |
tree | 063efaae3758402b84f056438b704d1de68f7837 /net/core/sock.c | |
parent | 83d7eb2979cd3390c375470225dd2d8f2009bc70 (diff) |
net: sock_def_readable() and friends RCU conversion
sk_callback_lock rwlock actually protects sk->sk_sleep pointer, so we
need two atomic operations (and associated dirtying) per incoming
packet.
RCU conversion is pretty much needed :
1) Add a new structure, called "struct socket_wq" to hold all fields
that will need rcu_read_lock() protection (currently: a
wait_queue_head_t and a struct fasync_struct pointer).
[Future patch will add a list anchor for wakeup coalescing]
2) Attach one of such structure to each "struct socket" created in
sock_alloc_inode().
3) Respect RCU grace period when freeing a "struct socket_wq"
4) Change sk_sleep pointer in "struct sock" by sk_wq, pointer to "struct
socket_wq"
5) Change sk_sleep() function to use new sk->sk_wq instead of
sk->sk_sleep
6) Change sk_has_sleeper() to wq_has_sleeper() that must be used inside
a rcu_read_lock() section.
7) Change all sk_has_sleeper() callers to :
- Use rcu_read_lock() instead of read_lock(&sk->sk_callback_lock)
- Use wq_has_sleeper() to eventually wakeup tasks.
- Use rcu_read_unlock() instead of read_unlock(&sk->sk_callback_lock)
8) sock_wake_async() is modified to use rcu protection as well.
9) Exceptions :
macvtap, drivers/net/tun.c, af_unix use integrated "struct socket_wq"
instead of dynamically allocated ones. They dont need rcu freeing.
Some cleanups or followups are probably needed, (possible
sk_callback_lock conversion to a spinlock for example...).
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/core/sock.c')
-rw-r--r-- | net/core/sock.c | 50 |
1 files changed, 31 insertions, 19 deletions
diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c index 51041759517e..94c4affdda9b 100644 --- a/net/core/sock.c +++ b/net/core/sock.c @@ -1211,7 +1211,7 @@ struct sock *sk_clone(const struct sock *sk, const gfp_t priority) */ sk_refcnt_debug_inc(newsk); sk_set_socket(newsk, NULL); - newsk->sk_sleep = NULL; + newsk->sk_wq = NULL; if (newsk->sk_prot->sockets_allocated) percpu_counter_inc(newsk->sk_prot->sockets_allocated); @@ -1800,41 +1800,53 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(sock_no_sendpage); static void sock_def_wakeup(struct sock *sk) { - read_lock(&sk->sk_callback_lock); - if (sk_has_sleeper(sk)) - wake_up_interruptible_all(sk_sleep(sk)); - read_unlock(&sk->sk_callback_lock); + struct socket_wq *wq; + + rcu_read_lock(); + wq = rcu_dereference(sk->sk_wq); + if (wq_has_sleeper(wq)) + wake_up_interruptible_all(&wq->wait); + rcu_read_unlock(); } static void sock_def_error_report(struct sock *sk) { - read_lock(&sk->sk_callback_lock); - if (sk_has_sleeper(sk)) - wake_up_interruptible_poll(sk_sleep(sk), POLLERR); + struct socket_wq *wq; + + rcu_read_lock(); + wq = rcu_dereference(sk->sk_wq); + if (wq_has_sleeper(wq)) + wake_up_interruptible_poll(&wq->wait, POLLERR); sk_wake_async(sk, SOCK_WAKE_IO, POLL_ERR); - read_unlock(&sk->sk_callback_lock); + rcu_read_unlock(); } static void sock_def_readable(struct sock *sk, int len) { - read_lock(&sk->sk_callback_lock); - if (sk_has_sleeper(sk)) - wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll(sk_sleep(sk), POLLIN | + struct socket_wq *wq; + + rcu_read_lock(); + wq = rcu_dereference(sk->sk_wq); + if (wq_has_sleeper(wq)) + wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll(&wq->wait, POLLIN | POLLRDNORM | POLLRDBAND); sk_wake_async(sk, SOCK_WAKE_WAITD, POLL_IN); - read_unlock(&sk->sk_callback_lock); + rcu_read_unlock(); } static void sock_def_write_space(struct sock *sk) { - read_lock(&sk->sk_callback_lock); + struct socket_wq *wq; + + rcu_read_lock(); /* Do not wake up a writer until he can make "significant" * progress. --DaveM */ if ((atomic_read(&sk->sk_wmem_alloc) << 1) <= sk->sk_sndbuf) { - if (sk_has_sleeper(sk)) - wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll(sk_sleep(sk), POLLOUT | + wq = rcu_dereference(sk->sk_wq); + if (wq_has_sleeper(wq)) + wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll(&wq->wait, POLLOUT | POLLWRNORM | POLLWRBAND); /* Should agree with poll, otherwise some programs break */ @@ -1842,7 +1854,7 @@ static void sock_def_write_space(struct sock *sk) sk_wake_async(sk, SOCK_WAKE_SPACE, POLL_OUT); } - read_unlock(&sk->sk_callback_lock); + rcu_read_unlock(); } static void sock_def_destruct(struct sock *sk) @@ -1896,10 +1908,10 @@ void sock_init_data(struct socket *sock, struct sock *sk) if (sock) { sk->sk_type = sock->type; - sk->sk_sleep = &sock->wait; + sk->sk_wq = sock->wq; sock->sk = sk; } else - sk->sk_sleep = NULL; + sk->sk_wq = NULL; spin_lock_init(&sk->sk_dst_lock); rwlock_init(&sk->sk_callback_lock); |