diff options
| author | Fengguang Wu <wfg@mail.ustc.edu.cn> | 2007-10-16 23:30:43 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@woody.linux-foundation.org> | 2007-10-17 08:43:02 -0700 |
| commit | 2e6883bdf49abd0e7f0d9b6297fc3be7ebb2250b (patch) | |
| tree | aec0418150413c7e9f43fb2ec68bfd24738b0623 /mm | |
| parent | 1f7decf6d9f06dac008b8d66935c0c3b18e564f9 (diff) | |
writeback: introduce writeback_control.more_io to indicate more io
After making dirty a 100M file, the normal behavior is to start the writeback
for all data after 30s delays. But sometimes the following happens instead:
- after 30s: ~4M
- after 5s: ~4M
- after 5s: all remaining 92M
Some analyze shows that the internal io dispatch queues goes like this:
s_io s_more_io
-------------------------
1) 100M,1K 0
2) 1K 96M
3) 0 96M
1) initial state with a 100M file and a 1K file
2) 4M written, nr_to_write <= 0, so write more
3) 1K written, nr_to_write > 0, no more writes(BUG)
nr_to_write > 0 in (3) fools the upper layer to think that data have all been
written out. The big dirty file is actually still sitting in s_more_io. We
cannot simply splice s_more_io back to s_io as soon as s_io becomes empty, and
let the loop in generic_sync_sb_inodes() continue: this may starve newly
expired inodes in s_dirty. It is also not an option to draw inodes from both
s_more_io and s_dirty, an let the loop go on: this might lead to live locks,
and might also starve other superblocks in sync time(well kupdate may still
starve some superblocks, that's another bug).
We have to return when a full scan of s_io completes. So nr_to_write > 0 does
not necessarily mean that "all data are written". This patch introduces a
flag writeback_control.more_io to indicate this situation. With it the big
dirty file no longer has to wait for the next kupdate invocation 5s later.
Cc: David Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>
Cc: Ken Chen <kenchen@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <wfg@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm')
| -rw-r--r-- | mm/page-writeback.c | 9 |
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c index 334852131588..bcdbbf6c4a85 100644 --- a/mm/page-writeback.c +++ b/mm/page-writeback.c @@ -553,6 +553,7 @@ static void background_writeout(unsigned long _min_pages) global_page_state(NR_UNSTABLE_NFS) < background_thresh && min_pages <= 0) break; + wbc.more_io = 0; wbc.encountered_congestion = 0; wbc.nr_to_write = MAX_WRITEBACK_PAGES; wbc.pages_skipped = 0; @@ -560,8 +561,9 @@ static void background_writeout(unsigned long _min_pages) min_pages -= MAX_WRITEBACK_PAGES - wbc.nr_to_write; if (wbc.nr_to_write > 0 || wbc.pages_skipped > 0) { /* Wrote less than expected */ - congestion_wait(WRITE, HZ/10); - if (!wbc.encountered_congestion) + if (wbc.encountered_congestion || wbc.more_io) + congestion_wait(WRITE, HZ/10); + else break; } } @@ -626,11 +628,12 @@ static void wb_kupdate(unsigned long arg) global_page_state(NR_UNSTABLE_NFS) + (inodes_stat.nr_inodes - inodes_stat.nr_unused); while (nr_to_write > 0) { + wbc.more_io = 0; wbc.encountered_congestion = 0; wbc.nr_to_write = MAX_WRITEBACK_PAGES; writeback_inodes(&wbc); if (wbc.nr_to_write > 0) { - if (wbc.encountered_congestion) + if (wbc.encountered_congestion || wbc.more_io) congestion_wait(WRITE, HZ/10); else break; /* All the old data is written */ |