mm, mempolicy: simplify rebinding mempolicies when updating cpusets

Commit c0ff7453bb5c ("cpuset,mm: fix no node to alloc memory when
changing cpuset's mems") has introduced a two-step protocol when
rebinding task's mempolicy due to cpuset update, in order to avoid a
parallel allocation seeing an empty effective nodemask and failing.

Later, commit cc9a6c877661 ("cpuset: mm: reduce large amounts of memory
barrier related damage v3") introduced a seqlock protection and removed
the synchronization point between the two update steps.  At that point
(or perhaps later), the two-step rebinding became unnecessary.

Currently it only makes sure that the update first adds new nodes in
step 1 and then removes nodes in step 2.  Without memory barriers the
effects are questionable, and even then this cannot prevent a parallel
zonelist iteration checking the nodemask at each step to observe all
nodes as unusable for allocation.  We now fully rely on the seqlock to
prevent premature OOMs and allocation failures.

We can thus remove the two-step update parts and simplify the code.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170517081140.30654-5-vbabka@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Anshuman Khandual <khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

1 files changed, 18 insertions, 84 deletions

diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
index c60807625fd5..047181452040 100644
--- a/mm/mempolicy.c
+++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
@@ -146,22 +146,7 @@ struct mempolicy *get_task_policy(struct task_struct *p)
 
 static const struct mempolicy_operations {
 	int (*create)(struct mempolicy *pol, const nodemask_t *nodes);
-	/*
-	 * If read-side task has no lock to protect task->mempolicy, write-side
-	 * task will rebind the task->mempolicy by two step. The first step is
-	 * setting all the newly nodes, and the second step is cleaning all the
-	 * disallowed nodes. In this way, we can avoid finding no node to alloc
-	 * page.
-	 * If we have a lock to protect task->mempolicy in read-side, we do
-	 * rebind directly.
-	 *
-	 * step:
-	 * 	MPOL_REBIND_ONCE - do rebind work at once
-	 * 	MPOL_REBIND_STEP1 - set all the newly nodes
-	 * 	MPOL_REBIND_STEP2 - clean all the disallowed nodes
-	 */
-	void (*rebind)(struct mempolicy *pol, const nodemask_t *nodes,
-			enum mpol_rebind_step step);
+	void (*rebind)(struct mempolicy *pol, const nodemask_t *nodes);
 } mpol_ops[MPOL_MAX];
 
 static inline int mpol_store_user_nodemask(const struct mempolicy *pol)
@@ -304,19 +289,11 @@ void __mpol_put(struct mempolicy *p)
 	kmem_cache_free(policy_cache, p);
 }
 
-static void mpol_rebind_default(struct mempolicy *pol, const nodemask_t *nodes,
-				enum mpol_rebind_step step)
+static void mpol_rebind_default(struct mempolicy *pol, const nodemask_t *nodes)
 {
 }
 
-/*
- * step:
- * 	MPOL_REBIND_ONCE  - do rebind work at once
- * 	MPOL_REBIND_STEP1 - set all the newly nodes
- * 	MPOL_REBIND_STEP2 - clean all the disallowed nodes
- */
-static void mpol_rebind_nodemask(struct mempolicy *pol, const nodemask_t *nodes,
-				 enum mpol_rebind_step step)
+static void mpol_rebind_nodemask(struct mempolicy *pol, const nodemask_t *nodes)
 {
 	nodemask_t tmp;
 
@@ -325,35 +302,19 @@ static void mpol_rebind_nodemask(struct mempolicy *pol, const nodemask_t *nodes,
 	else if (pol->flags & MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES)
 		mpol_relative_nodemask(&tmp, &pol->w.user_nodemask, nodes);
 	else {
-		/*
-		 * if step == 1, we use ->w.cpuset_mems_allowed to cache the
-		 * result
-		 */
-		if (step == MPOL_REBIND_ONCE || step == MPOL_REBIND_STEP1) {
-			nodes_remap(tmp, pol->v.nodes,
-					pol->w.cpuset_mems_allowed, *nodes);
-			pol->w.cpuset_mems_allowed = step ? tmp : *nodes;
-		} else if (step == MPOL_REBIND_STEP2) {
-			tmp = pol->w.cpuset_mems_allowed;
-			pol->w.cpuset_mems_allowed = *nodes;
-		} else
-			BUG();
+		nodes_remap(tmp, pol->v.nodes,pol->w.cpuset_mems_allowed,
+								*nodes);
+		pol->w.cpuset_mems_allowed = tmp;
 	}
 
 	if (nodes_empty(tmp))
 		tmp = *nodes;
 
-	if (step == MPOL_REBIND_STEP1)
-		nodes_or(pol->v.nodes, pol->v.nodes, tmp);
-	else if (step == MPOL_REBIND_ONCE || step == MPOL_REBIND_STEP2)
-		pol->v.nodes = tmp;
-	else
-		BUG();
+	pol->v.nodes = tmp;
 }
 
 static void mpol_rebind_preferred(struct mempolicy *pol,
-				  const nodemask_t *nodes,
-				  enum mpol_rebind_step step)
+						const nodemask_t *nodes)
 {
 	nodemask_t tmp;
 
@@ -379,42 +340,19 @@ static void mpol_rebind_preferred(struct mempolicy *pol,
 /*
  * mpol_rebind_policy - Migrate a policy to a different set of nodes
  *
- * If read-side task has no lock to protect task->mempolicy, write-side
- * task will rebind the task->mempolicy by two step. The first step is
- * setting all the newly nodes, and the second step is cleaning all the
- * disallowed nodes. In this way, we can avoid finding no node to alloc
- * page.
- * If we have a lock to protect task->mempolicy in read-side, we do
- * rebind directly.
- *
- * step:
- * 	MPOL_REBIND_ONCE  - do rebind work at once
- * 	MPOL_REBIND_STEP1 - set all the newly nodes
- * 	MPOL_REBIND_STEP2 - clean all the disallowed nodes
+ * Per-vma policies are protected by mmap_sem. Allocations using per-task
+ * policies are protected by task->mems_allowed_seq to prevent a premature
+ * OOM/allocation failure due to parallel nodemask modification.
  */
-static void mpol_rebind_policy(struct mempolicy *pol, const nodemask_t *newmask,
-				enum mpol_rebind_step step)
+static void mpol_rebind_policy(struct mempolicy *pol, const nodemask_t *newmask)
 {
 	if (!pol)
 		return;
-	if (!mpol_store_user_nodemask(pol) && step == MPOL_REBIND_ONCE &&
+	if (!mpol_store_user_nodemask(pol) &&
 	    nodes_equal(pol->w.cpuset_mems_allowed, *newmask))
 		return;
 
-	if (step == MPOL_REBIND_STEP1 && (pol->flags & MPOL_F_REBINDING))
-		return;
-
-	if (step == MPOL_REBIND_STEP2 && !(pol->flags & MPOL_F_REBINDING))
-		BUG();
-
-	if (step == MPOL_REBIND_STEP1)
-		pol->flags |= MPOL_F_REBINDING;
-	else if (step == MPOL_REBIND_STEP2)
-		pol->flags &= ~MPOL_F_REBINDING;
-	else if (step >= MPOL_REBIND_NSTEP)
-		BUG();
-
-	mpol_ops[pol->mode].rebind(pol, newmask, step);
+	mpol_ops[pol->mode].rebind(pol, newmask);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -424,10 +362,9 @@ static void mpol_rebind_policy(struct mempolicy *pol, const nodemask_t *newmask,
  * Called with task's alloc_lock held.
  */
 
-void mpol_rebind_task(struct task_struct *tsk, const nodemask_t *new,
-			enum mpol_rebind_step step)
+void mpol_rebind_task(struct task_struct *tsk, const nodemask_t *new)
 {
-	mpol_rebind_policy(tsk->mempolicy, new, step);
+	mpol_rebind_policy(tsk->mempolicy, new);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -442,7 +379,7 @@ void mpol_rebind_mm(struct mm_struct *mm, nodemask_t *new)
 
 	down_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
 	for (vma = mm->mmap; vma; vma = vma->vm_next)
-		mpol_rebind_policy(vma->vm_policy, new, MPOL_REBIND_ONCE);
+		mpol_rebind_policy(vma->vm_policy, new);
 	up_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
 }
 
@@ -2101,10 +2038,7 @@ struct mempolicy *__mpol_dup(struct mempolicy *old)
 
 	if (current_cpuset_is_being_rebound()) {
 		nodemask_t mems = cpuset_mems_allowed(current);
-		if (new->flags & MPOL_F_REBINDING)
-			mpol_rebind_policy(new, &mems, MPOL_REBIND_STEP2);
-		else
-			mpol_rebind_policy(new, &mems, MPOL_REBIND_ONCE);
+		mpol_rebind_policy(new, &mems);
 	}
 	atomic_set(&new->refcnt, 1);
 	return new;