diff options
author | Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com> | 2022-09-01 18:41:31 +0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> | 2022-10-11 19:05:44 -0700 |
commit | fac35ba763ed07ba93154c95ffc0c4a55023707f (patch) | |
tree | 1481c3ae84db3e9eeb1fa5d11e9fcffe489f3f81 /mm/gup.c | |
parent | 1c8e2349f2d033f634d046063b704b2ca6c46972 (diff) |
mm/hugetlb: fix races when looking up a CONT-PTE/PMD size hugetlb page
On some architectures (like ARM64), it can support CONT-PTE/PMD size
hugetlb, which means it can support not only PMD/PUD size hugetlb (2M and
1G), but also CONT-PTE/PMD size(64K and 32M) if a 4K page size specified.
So when looking up a CONT-PTE size hugetlb page by follow_page(), it will
use pte_offset_map_lock() to get the pte entry lock for the CONT-PTE size
hugetlb in follow_page_pte(). However this pte entry lock is incorrect
for the CONT-PTE size hugetlb, since we should use huge_pte_lock() to get
the correct lock, which is mm->page_table_lock.
That means the pte entry of the CONT-PTE size hugetlb under current pte
lock is unstable in follow_page_pte(), we can continue to migrate or
poison the pte entry of the CONT-PTE size hugetlb, which can cause some
potential race issues, even though they are under the 'pte lock'.
For example, suppose thread A is trying to look up a CONT-PTE size hugetlb
page by move_pages() syscall under the lock, however antoher thread B can
migrate the CONT-PTE hugetlb page at the same time, which will cause
thread A to get an incorrect page, if thread A also wants to do page
migration, then data inconsistency error occurs.
Moreover we have the same issue for CONT-PMD size hugetlb in
follow_huge_pmd().
To fix above issues, rename the follow_huge_pmd() as follow_huge_pmd_pte()
to handle PMD and PTE level size hugetlb, which uses huge_pte_lock() to
get the correct pte entry lock to make the pte entry stable.
Mike said:
Support for CONT_PMD/_PTE was added with bb9dd3df8ee9 ("arm64: hugetlb:
refactor find_num_contig()"). Patch series "Support for contiguous pte
hugepages", v4. However, I do not believe these code paths were
executed until migration support was added with 5480280d3f2d ("arm64/mm:
enable HugeTLB migration for contiguous bit HugeTLB pages") I would go
with 5480280d3f2d for the Fixes: targe.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/635f43bdd85ac2615a58405da82b4d33c6e5eb05.1662017562.git.baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com
Fixes: 5480280d3f2d ("arm64/mm: enable HugeTLB migration for contiguous bit HugeTLB pages")
Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Suggested-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm/gup.c')
-rw-r--r-- | mm/gup.c | 14 |
1 files changed, 13 insertions, 1 deletions
@@ -530,6 +530,18 @@ static struct page *follow_page_pte(struct vm_area_struct *vma, if (WARN_ON_ONCE((flags & (FOLL_PIN | FOLL_GET)) == (FOLL_PIN | FOLL_GET))) return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); + + /* + * Considering PTE level hugetlb, like continuous-PTE hugetlb on + * ARM64 architecture. + */ + if (is_vm_hugetlb_page(vma)) { + page = follow_huge_pmd_pte(vma, address, flags); + if (page) + return page; + return no_page_table(vma, flags); + } + retry: if (unlikely(pmd_bad(*pmd))) return no_page_table(vma, flags); @@ -662,7 +674,7 @@ static struct page *follow_pmd_mask(struct vm_area_struct *vma, if (pmd_none(pmdval)) return no_page_table(vma, flags); if (pmd_huge(pmdval) && is_vm_hugetlb_page(vma)) { - page = follow_huge_pmd(mm, address, pmd, flags); + page = follow_huge_pmd_pte(vma, address, flags); if (page) return page; return no_page_table(vma, flags); |