diff options
| author | Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> | 2019-11-15 19:01:25 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> | 2019-11-15 11:53:35 -0800 |
| commit | 49e9d1a9faf2f71fdfd80a30697ee9a15070626d (patch) | |
| tree | 46cce09b371206318000616b04536aa16f189e46 /kernel | |
| parent | e66b39af00f426b3356b96433d620cb3367ba1ff (diff) | |
workqueue: Add RCU annotation for pwq list walk
An additional check has been recently added to ensure that a RCU related lock
is held while the RCU list is iterated.
The `pwqs' are sometimes iterated without a RCU lock but with the &wq->mutex
acquired leading to a warning.
Teach list_for_each_entry_rcu() that the RCU usage is okay if &wq->mutex
is acquired during the list traversal.
Fixes: 28875945ba98d ("rcu: Add support for consolidated-RCU reader checking")
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel')
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/workqueue.c | 3 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c index 4dc8270326d7..914b845ad4ff 100644 --- a/kernel/workqueue.c +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c @@ -426,7 +426,8 @@ static void show_pwq(struct pool_workqueue *pwq); * ignored. */ #define for_each_pwq(pwq, wq) \ - list_for_each_entry_rcu((pwq), &(wq)->pwqs, pwqs_node) \ + list_for_each_entry_rcu((pwq), &(wq)->pwqs, pwqs_node, \ + lockdep_is_held(&wq->mutex)) \ if (({ assert_rcu_or_wq_mutex(wq); false; })) { } \ else |