diff options
author | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2017-10-14 15:14:20 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2017-10-14 15:14:20 -0400 |
commit | 60a6ca6c943bee3c76b5905e66d5fcd83ae8d34f (patch) | |
tree | d9e96036c963ace769577e3ebf6af76fafcc8948 /kernel | |
parent | 2b34218e893a0ff39f6f46517cb5df2f990db8c0 (diff) | |
parent | b483cf3bc249d7af706390efa63d6671e80d1c09 (diff) |
Merge branch 'locking-urgent-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip
Pull locking fixes from Ingo Molnar:
"Two lockdep fixes for bugs introduced by the cross-release dependency
tracking feature - plus a commit that disables it because performance
regressed in an absymal fashion on some systems"
* 'locking-urgent-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
locking/lockdep: Disable cross-release features for now
locking/selftest: Avoid false BUG report
locking/lockdep: Fix stacktrace mess
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel')
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 48 |
1 files changed, 20 insertions, 28 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c index 44c8d0d17170..e36e652d996f 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c +++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c @@ -1873,10 +1873,10 @@ check_prev_add(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *prev, struct held_lock *next, int distance, struct stack_trace *trace, int (*save)(struct stack_trace *trace)) { + struct lock_list *uninitialized_var(target_entry); struct lock_list *entry; - int ret; struct lock_list this; - struct lock_list *uninitialized_var(target_entry); + int ret; /* * Prove that the new <prev> -> <next> dependency would not @@ -1890,8 +1890,17 @@ check_prev_add(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *prev, this.class = hlock_class(next); this.parent = NULL; ret = check_noncircular(&this, hlock_class(prev), &target_entry); - if (unlikely(!ret)) + if (unlikely(!ret)) { + if (!trace->entries) { + /* + * If @save fails here, the printing might trigger + * a WARN but because of the !nr_entries it should + * not do bad things. + */ + save(trace); + } return print_circular_bug(&this, target_entry, next, prev, trace); + } else if (unlikely(ret < 0)) return print_bfs_bug(ret); @@ -1938,7 +1947,7 @@ check_prev_add(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *prev, return print_bfs_bug(ret); - if (save && !save(trace)) + if (!trace->entries && !save(trace)) return 0; /* @@ -1958,20 +1967,6 @@ check_prev_add(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *prev, if (!ret) return 0; - /* - * Debugging printouts: - */ - if (verbose(hlock_class(prev)) || verbose(hlock_class(next))) { - graph_unlock(); - printk("\n new dependency: "); - print_lock_name(hlock_class(prev)); - printk(KERN_CONT " => "); - print_lock_name(hlock_class(next)); - printk(KERN_CONT "\n"); - dump_stack(); - if (!graph_lock()) - return 0; - } return 2; } @@ -1986,8 +1981,12 @@ check_prevs_add(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *next) { int depth = curr->lockdep_depth; struct held_lock *hlock; - struct stack_trace trace; - int (*save)(struct stack_trace *trace) = save_trace; + struct stack_trace trace = { + .nr_entries = 0, + .max_entries = 0, + .entries = NULL, + .skip = 0, + }; /* * Debugging checks. @@ -2018,18 +2017,11 @@ check_prevs_add(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *next) */ if (hlock->read != 2 && hlock->check) { int ret = check_prev_add(curr, hlock, next, - distance, &trace, save); + distance, &trace, save_trace); if (!ret) return 0; /* - * Stop saving stack_trace if save_trace() was - * called at least once: - */ - if (save && ret == 2) - save = NULL; - - /* * Stop after the first non-trylock entry, * as non-trylock entries have added their * own direct dependencies already, so this |