summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/kernel
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2017-10-14 15:14:20 -0400
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2017-10-14 15:14:20 -0400
commit60a6ca6c943bee3c76b5905e66d5fcd83ae8d34f (patch)
treed9e96036c963ace769577e3ebf6af76fafcc8948 /kernel
parent2b34218e893a0ff39f6f46517cb5df2f990db8c0 (diff)
parentb483cf3bc249d7af706390efa63d6671e80d1c09 (diff)
Merge branch 'locking-urgent-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip
Pull locking fixes from Ingo Molnar: "Two lockdep fixes for bugs introduced by the cross-release dependency tracking feature - plus a commit that disables it because performance regressed in an absymal fashion on some systems" * 'locking-urgent-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: locking/lockdep: Disable cross-release features for now locking/selftest: Avoid false BUG report locking/lockdep: Fix stacktrace mess
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel')
-rw-r--r--kernel/locking/lockdep.c48
1 files changed, 20 insertions, 28 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
index 44c8d0d17170..e36e652d996f 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -1873,10 +1873,10 @@ check_prev_add(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *prev,
struct held_lock *next, int distance, struct stack_trace *trace,
int (*save)(struct stack_trace *trace))
{
+ struct lock_list *uninitialized_var(target_entry);
struct lock_list *entry;
- int ret;
struct lock_list this;
- struct lock_list *uninitialized_var(target_entry);
+ int ret;
/*
* Prove that the new <prev> -> <next> dependency would not
@@ -1890,8 +1890,17 @@ check_prev_add(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *prev,
this.class = hlock_class(next);
this.parent = NULL;
ret = check_noncircular(&this, hlock_class(prev), &target_entry);
- if (unlikely(!ret))
+ if (unlikely(!ret)) {
+ if (!trace->entries) {
+ /*
+ * If @save fails here, the printing might trigger
+ * a WARN but because of the !nr_entries it should
+ * not do bad things.
+ */
+ save(trace);
+ }
return print_circular_bug(&this, target_entry, next, prev, trace);
+ }
else if (unlikely(ret < 0))
return print_bfs_bug(ret);
@@ -1938,7 +1947,7 @@ check_prev_add(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *prev,
return print_bfs_bug(ret);
- if (save && !save(trace))
+ if (!trace->entries && !save(trace))
return 0;
/*
@@ -1958,20 +1967,6 @@ check_prev_add(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *prev,
if (!ret)
return 0;
- /*
- * Debugging printouts:
- */
- if (verbose(hlock_class(prev)) || verbose(hlock_class(next))) {
- graph_unlock();
- printk("\n new dependency: ");
- print_lock_name(hlock_class(prev));
- printk(KERN_CONT " => ");
- print_lock_name(hlock_class(next));
- printk(KERN_CONT "\n");
- dump_stack();
- if (!graph_lock())
- return 0;
- }
return 2;
}
@@ -1986,8 +1981,12 @@ check_prevs_add(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *next)
{
int depth = curr->lockdep_depth;
struct held_lock *hlock;
- struct stack_trace trace;
- int (*save)(struct stack_trace *trace) = save_trace;
+ struct stack_trace trace = {
+ .nr_entries = 0,
+ .max_entries = 0,
+ .entries = NULL,
+ .skip = 0,
+ };
/*
* Debugging checks.
@@ -2018,18 +2017,11 @@ check_prevs_add(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *next)
*/
if (hlock->read != 2 && hlock->check) {
int ret = check_prev_add(curr, hlock, next,
- distance, &trace, save);
+ distance, &trace, save_trace);
if (!ret)
return 0;
/*
- * Stop saving stack_trace if save_trace() was
- * called at least once:
- */
- if (save && ret == 2)
- save = NULL;
-
- /*
* Stop after the first non-trylock entry,
* as non-trylock entries have added their
* own direct dependencies already, so this