diff options
author | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2021-02-23 14:59:46 -0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2021-02-23 14:59:46 -0800 |
commit | 005d3bd9e332faa976320cfaa2ae0637c8e94c51 (patch) | |
tree | 80b1a2aa320eb08ad51dacbbd49926d5f51857ef /kernel | |
parent | e0fbd25bb37e7bb1f5ad9c9f7e5fc89152aec87e (diff) | |
parent | 08c2a406b974eea893dd9b2f159d715f2b15c683 (diff) |
Merge tag 'pm-5.12-rc1-2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm
Pull more power management updates from Rafael Wysocki:
"These are fixes and cleanups on top of the power management material
for 5.12-rc1 merged previously.
Specifics:
- Address cpufreq regression introduced in 5.11 that causes CPU
frequency reporting to be distorted on systems with CPPC that use
acpi-cpufreq as the scaling driver (Rafael Wysocki).
- Fix regression introduced during the 5.10 development cycle related
to CPU hotplug and policy recreation in the qcom-cpufreq-hw driver
(Shawn Guo).
- Fix recent regression in the operating performance points (OPP)
framework that may cause frequency updates to be skipped by mistake
in some cases (Jonathan Marek).
- Simplify schedutil governor code and remove a misleading comment
from it (Yue Hu).
- Fix kerneldoc comment typo in the cpufreq core (Yue Hu)"
* tag 'pm-5.12-rc1-2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm:
cpufreq: Fix typo in kerneldoc comment
cpufreq: schedutil: Remove update_lock comment from struct sugov_policy definition
cpufreq: schedutil: Remove needless sg_policy parameter from ignore_dl_rate_limit()
cpufreq: ACPI: Set cpuinfo.max_freq directly if max boost is known
cpufreq: qcom-hw: drop devm_xxx() calls from init/exit hooks
opp: Don't skip freq update for different frequency
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel')
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 14 |
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c index 41e498b0008a..50cbad89f7fa 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c +++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ struct sugov_policy { struct sugov_tunables *tunables; struct list_head tunables_hook; - raw_spinlock_t update_lock; /* For shared policies */ + raw_spinlock_t update_lock; u64 last_freq_update_time; s64 freq_update_delay_ns; unsigned int next_freq; @@ -320,23 +320,21 @@ static inline bool sugov_cpu_is_busy(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu) { return false; } * Make sugov_should_update_freq() ignore the rate limit when DL * has increased the utilization. */ -static inline void ignore_dl_rate_limit(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu, struct sugov_policy *sg_policy) +static inline void ignore_dl_rate_limit(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu) { if (cpu_bw_dl(cpu_rq(sg_cpu->cpu)) > sg_cpu->bw_dl) - sg_policy->limits_changed = true; + sg_cpu->sg_policy->limits_changed = true; } static inline bool sugov_update_single_common(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu, u64 time, unsigned int flags) { - struct sugov_policy *sg_policy = sg_cpu->sg_policy; - sugov_iowait_boost(sg_cpu, time, flags); sg_cpu->last_update = time; - ignore_dl_rate_limit(sg_cpu, sg_policy); + ignore_dl_rate_limit(sg_cpu); - if (!sugov_should_update_freq(sg_policy, time)) + if (!sugov_should_update_freq(sg_cpu->sg_policy, time)) return false; sugov_get_util(sg_cpu); @@ -451,7 +449,7 @@ sugov_update_shared(struct update_util_data *hook, u64 time, unsigned int flags) sugov_iowait_boost(sg_cpu, time, flags); sg_cpu->last_update = time; - ignore_dl_rate_limit(sg_cpu, sg_policy); + ignore_dl_rate_limit(sg_cpu); if (sugov_should_update_freq(sg_policy, time)) { next_f = sugov_next_freq_shared(sg_cpu, time); |