diff options
| author | Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> | 2013-04-01 11:23:35 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> | 2013-04-01 11:23:35 -0700 |
| commit | e50aba9aea63b7617887b4d9694184f478731c82 (patch) | |
| tree | 68649f81762c3088c535d3bdb4743c2d96f6c7eb /kernel/workqueue.c | |
| parent | f147f29eb7c4959e5f8be604ce2d23979c86378c (diff) | |
workqueue: use NUMA-aware allocation for pool_workqueues
Use kmem_cache_alloc_node() with @pool->node instead of
kmem_cache_zalloc() when allocating a pool_workqueue so that it's
allocated on the same node as the associated worker_pool. As there's
no no kmem_cache_zalloc_node(), move zeroing to init_pwq().
This was suggested by Lai Jiangshan.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/workqueue.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/workqueue.c | 6 |
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c index c8d047b6c895..07ec57459457 100644 --- a/kernel/workqueue.c +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c @@ -3626,12 +3626,14 @@ static void pwq_adjust_max_active(struct pool_workqueue *pwq) spin_unlock_irq(&pwq->pool->lock); } -/* initialize newly zalloced @pwq which is associated with @wq and @pool */ +/* initialize newly alloced @pwq which is associated with @wq and @pool */ static void init_pwq(struct pool_workqueue *pwq, struct workqueue_struct *wq, struct worker_pool *pool) { BUG_ON((unsigned long)pwq & WORK_STRUCT_FLAG_MASK); + memset(pwq, 0, sizeof(*pwq)); + pwq->pool = pool; pwq->wq = wq; pwq->flush_color = -1; @@ -3677,7 +3679,7 @@ static struct pool_workqueue *alloc_unbound_pwq(struct workqueue_struct *wq, if (!pool) return NULL; - pwq = kmem_cache_zalloc(pwq_cache, GFP_KERNEL); + pwq = kmem_cache_alloc_node(pwq_cache, GFP_KERNEL, pool->node); if (!pwq) { put_unbound_pool(pool); return NULL; |