diff options
| author | Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it> | 2015-10-16 10:06:21 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> | 2015-10-20 10:13:36 +0200 |
| commit | 5aa5050787f449e7eaef2c5ec93c7b357aa7dcdc (patch) | |
| tree | 415d7714d29be706d5713a6a2447500eba8d9c00 /kernel/sched/deadline.c | |
| parent | 0baabb385eb4bce699ddab0db015112be6cf1e6a (diff) | |
sched/deadline: Fix migration of SCHED_DEADLINE tasks
Commit:
9d5142624256 ("sched/deadline: Reduce rq lock contention by eliminating locking of non-feasible target")
broke select_task_rq_dl() and find_lock_later_rq(), because it introduced
a comparison between the local task's deadline and dl.earliest_dl.curr of
the remote queue.
However, if the remote runqueue does not contain any SCHED_DEADLINE
task its earliest_dl.curr is 0 (always smaller than the deadline of
the local task) and the remote runqueue is not selected for pushing.
As a result, if an application creates multiple SCHED_DEADLINE
threads, they will never be pushed to runqueues that do not already
contain SCHED_DEADLINE tasks.
This patch fixes the issue by checking if dl.dl_nr_running == 0.
Signed-off-by: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>
Fixes: 9d5142624256 ("sched/deadline: Reduce rq lock contention by eliminating locking of non-feasible target")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1444982781-15608-1-git-send-email-luca.abeni@unitn.it
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/sched/deadline.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/sched/deadline.c | 8 |
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c index fc8f01083527..142df2668e5d 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c @@ -1066,8 +1066,9 @@ select_task_rq_dl(struct task_struct *p, int cpu, int sd_flag, int flags) int target = find_later_rq(p); if (target != -1 && - dl_time_before(p->dl.deadline, - cpu_rq(target)->dl.earliest_dl.curr)) + (dl_time_before(p->dl.deadline, + cpu_rq(target)->dl.earliest_dl.curr) || + (cpu_rq(target)->dl.dl_nr_running == 0))) cpu = target; } rcu_read_unlock(); @@ -1417,7 +1418,8 @@ static struct rq *find_lock_later_rq(struct task_struct *task, struct rq *rq) later_rq = cpu_rq(cpu); - if (!dl_time_before(task->dl.deadline, + if (later_rq->dl.dl_nr_running && + !dl_time_before(task->dl.deadline, later_rq->dl.earliest_dl.curr)) { /* * Target rq has tasks of equal or earlier deadline, |