diff options
author | Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> | 2014-10-20 18:12:32 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> | 2014-10-21 23:44:21 +0200 |
commit | 5695be142e203167e3cb515ef86a88424f3524eb (patch) | |
tree | 2c2b21d91658f23b3290db56f726959863ee8248 /kernel/power/process.c | |
parent | c05eb32f472fb9f7f474c20ff6fa5bfe0cbedc05 (diff) |
OOM, PM: OOM killed task shouldn't escape PM suspend
PM freezer relies on having all tasks frozen by the time devices are
getting frozen so that no task will touch them while they are getting
frozen. But OOM killer is allowed to kill an already frozen task in
order to handle OOM situtation. In order to protect from late wake ups
OOM killer is disabled after all tasks are frozen. This, however, still
keeps a window open when a killed task didn't manage to die by the time
freeze_processes finishes.
Reduce the race window by checking all tasks after OOM killer has been
disabled. This is still not race free completely unfortunately because
oom_killer_disable cannot stop an already ongoing OOM killer so a task
might still wake up from the fridge and get killed without
freeze_processes noticing. Full synchronization of OOM and freezer is,
however, too heavy weight for this highly unlikely case.
Introduce and check oom_kills counter which gets incremented early when
the allocator enters __alloc_pages_may_oom path and only check all the
tasks if the counter changes during the freezing attempt. The counter
is updated so early to reduce the race window since allocator checked
oom_killer_disabled which is set by PM-freezing code. A false positive
will push the PM-freezer into a slow path but that is not a big deal.
Changes since v1
- push the re-check loop out of freeze_processes into
check_frozen_processes and invert the condition to make the code more
readable as per Rafael
Fixes: f660daac474c6f (oom: thaw threads if oom killed thread is frozen before deferring)
Cc: 3.2+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.2+
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/power/process.c')
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/power/process.c | 40 |
1 files changed, 39 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/power/process.c b/kernel/power/process.c index 7b323221b9ee..5cc588c1abab 100644 --- a/kernel/power/process.c +++ b/kernel/power/process.c @@ -108,6 +108,28 @@ static int try_to_freeze_tasks(bool user_only) return todo ? -EBUSY : 0; } +/* + * Returns true if all freezable tasks (except for current) are frozen already + */ +static bool check_frozen_processes(void) +{ + struct task_struct *g, *p; + bool ret = true; + + read_lock(&tasklist_lock); + for_each_process_thread(g, p) { + if (p != current && !freezer_should_skip(p) && + !frozen(p)) { + ret = false; + goto done; + } + } +done: + read_unlock(&tasklist_lock); + + return ret; +} + /** * freeze_processes - Signal user space processes to enter the refrigerator. * The current thread will not be frozen. The same process that calls @@ -118,6 +140,7 @@ static int try_to_freeze_tasks(bool user_only) int freeze_processes(void) { int error; + int oom_kills_saved; error = __usermodehelper_disable(UMH_FREEZING); if (error) @@ -132,12 +155,27 @@ int freeze_processes(void) pm_wakeup_clear(); printk("Freezing user space processes ... "); pm_freezing = true; + oom_kills_saved = oom_kills_count(); error = try_to_freeze_tasks(true); if (!error) { - printk("done."); __usermodehelper_set_disable_depth(UMH_DISABLED); oom_killer_disable(); + + /* + * There might have been an OOM kill while we were + * freezing tasks and the killed task might be still + * on the way out so we have to double check for race. + */ + if (oom_kills_count() != oom_kills_saved && + !check_frozen_processes()) { + __usermodehelper_set_disable_depth(UMH_ENABLED); + printk("OOM in progress."); + error = -EBUSY; + goto done; + } + printk("done."); } +done: printk("\n"); BUG_ON(in_atomic()); |