bpf: Refactor BPF_PROG_RUN into a function

Turn BPF_PROG_RUN into a proper always inlined function. No functional and
performance changes are intended, but it makes it much easier to understand
what's going on with how BPF programs are actually get executed. It's more
obvious what types and callbacks are expected. Also extra () around input
parameters can be dropped, as well as `__` variable prefixes intended to avoid
naming collisions, which makes the code simpler to read and write.

This refactoring also highlighted one extra issue. BPF_PROG_RUN is both
a macro and an enum value (BPF_PROG_RUN == BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN). Turning
BPF_PROG_RUN into a function causes naming conflict compilation error. So
rename BPF_PROG_RUN into lower-case bpf_prog_run(), similar to
bpf_prog_run_xdp(), bpf_prog_run_pin_on_cpu(), etc. All existing callers of
BPF_PROG_RUN, the macro, are switched to bpf_prog_run() explicitly.

Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210815070609.987780-2-andrii@kernel.org

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_iter.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_iter.c
index 2e9d47bb40ff..b2ee45064e06 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_iter.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_iter.c
@@ -686,7 +686,7 @@ int bpf_iter_run_prog(struct bpf_prog *prog, void *ctx)
 
 	rcu_read_lock();
 	migrate_disable();
-	ret = BPF_PROG_RUN(prog, ctx);
+	ret = bpf_prog_run(prog, ctx);
 	migrate_enable();
 	rcu_read_unlock();