diff options
author | Yi Zou <yi.zou@intel.com> | 2012-09-24 11:52:50 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | James Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com> | 2012-10-07 11:52:55 +0100 |
commit | 3b64b1881143ce9e461c211cc81acc72d0cdc476 (patch) | |
tree | 4a4869002d37f8b3257ae442caa67b5071e69fed /include/scsi/fc | |
parent | 31c37a6f21d86e6bca095b71d603ed543ae070ad (diff) |
[SCSI] libfc: fix lun reset failure bugs in fc_fcp_resp handling of FCP_RSP_INFO
In LUN RESET testing involving NetApp targets, it is observed that LUN
RESET is failing. The fc_fcp_resp() is not completing the completion
for the LUN RESET task since fc_fcp_resp assumes that the FCP_RSP_INFO
is 8 bytes with the 4 byte reserved field, where in case of NetApp targets
the FCP_RSP to LUN RESET only has 4 bytes of FCP_RSP_INFO. This leads
fc_fcp_resp to error out w/o completing the task completion, eventually
causing LUN RESET to be escalated to host reset, which is not very nice.
Per FCP-3 r04, clause 9.5.15 and Table 23, the FCP_RSP_INFO field can be either
4 bytes or 8 bytes, with the last 4 bytes as "Reserved (if any)". Therefore it
is valid to have 4 bytes FCP_RSP_INFO like some of the NetApp targets behave.
Fixing this by validating the FCP_RSP_INFO against both the two spec allowed
length.
Reported-by: Frank Zhang <frank_1.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Yi Zou <yi.zou@intel.com>
Tested-by: Ross Brattain <ross.b.brattain@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'include/scsi/fc')
-rw-r--r-- | include/scsi/fc/fc_fcp.h | 6 |
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/include/scsi/fc/fc_fcp.h b/include/scsi/fc/fc_fcp.h index 0d7d67e96d43..9c8702942b61 100644 --- a/include/scsi/fc/fc_fcp.h +++ b/include/scsi/fc/fc_fcp.h @@ -127,6 +127,9 @@ struct fcp_txrdy { * * All response frames will always contain the fcp_resp template. Some * will also include the fcp_resp_len template. + * + * From Table 23, the FCP_RSP_INFO can either be 4 bytes or 8 bytes, both + * are valid length. */ struct fcp_resp { __u8 _fr_resvd[8]; /* reserved */ @@ -156,6 +159,9 @@ struct fcp_resp_rsp_info { __u8 _fr_resvd2[4]; /* reserved */ }; +#define FCP_RESP_RSP_INFO_LEN4 4 /* without reserved field */ +#define FCP_RESP_RSP_INFO_LEN8 8 /* with reserved field */ + struct fcp_resp_with_ext { struct fcp_resp resp; struct fcp_resp_ext ext; |