summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>2024-04-25 16:24:29 -0400
committerTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>2024-05-20 11:37:15 -0400
commitf06d1b10cb016d5aaecdb1804fefca025387bd10 (patch)
treec419fa88261324df9acd7b7ceccbdbc2371912b2 /fs
parent0dc9f430027b8bd9073fdafdfcdeb1a073ab5594 (diff)
NFS: Fix READ_PLUS when server doesn't support OP_READ_PLUS
Olga showed me a case where the client was sending multiple READ_PLUS calls to the server in parallel, and the server replied NFS4ERR_OPNOTSUPP to each. The client would fall back to READ for the first reply, but fail to retry the other calls. I fix this by removing the test for NFS_CAP_READ_PLUS in nfs4_read_plus_not_supported(). This allows us to reschedule any READ_PLUS call that has a NFS4ERR_OPNOTSUPP return value, even after the capability has been cleared. Reported-by: Olga Kornievskaia <kolga@netapp.com> Fixes: c567552612ec ("NFS: Add READ_PLUS data segment support") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.10+ Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Reviewed-by: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs')
-rw-r--r--fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c2
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
index ea390db94b62..c93c12063b3a 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
@@ -5456,7 +5456,7 @@ static bool nfs4_read_plus_not_supported(struct rpc_task *task,
struct rpc_message *msg = &task->tk_msg;
if (msg->rpc_proc == &nfs4_procedures[NFSPROC4_CLNT_READ_PLUS] &&
- server->caps & NFS_CAP_READ_PLUS && task->tk_status == -ENOTSUPP) {
+ task->tk_status == -ENOTSUPP) {
server->caps &= ~NFS_CAP_READ_PLUS;
msg->rpc_proc = &nfs4_procedures[NFSPROC4_CLNT_READ];
rpc_restart_call_prepare(task);