summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorHou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>2023-01-13 19:52:10 +0800
committerDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>2023-01-30 12:51:53 +0000
commit8226e37d82f43657da34dd770e2b38f20242ada7 (patch)
tree88e3650426195b314e7af7cb59e905f0415833b7 /fs
parent6d796c50f84ca79f1722bb131799e5a5710c4700 (diff)
fscache: Use wait_on_bit() to wait for the freeing of relinquished volume
The freeing of relinquished volume will wake up the pending volume acquisition by using wake_up_bit(), however it is mismatched with wait_var_event() used in fscache_wait_on_volume_collision() and it will never wake up the waiter in the wait-queue because these two functions operate on different wait-queues. According to the implementation in fscache_wait_on_volume_collision(), if the wake-up of pending acquisition is delayed longer than 20 seconds (e.g., due to the delay of on-demand fd closing), the first wait_var_event_timeout() will timeout and the following wait_var_event() will hang forever as shown below: FS-Cache: Potential volume collision new=00000024 old=00000022 ...... INFO: task mount:1148 blocked for more than 122 seconds. Not tainted 6.1.0-rc6+ #1 task:mount state:D stack:0 pid:1148 ppid:1 Call Trace: <TASK> __schedule+0x2f6/0xb80 schedule+0x67/0xe0 fscache_wait_on_volume_collision.cold+0x80/0x82 __fscache_acquire_volume+0x40d/0x4e0 erofs_fscache_register_volume+0x51/0xe0 [erofs] erofs_fscache_register_fs+0x19c/0x240 [erofs] erofs_fc_fill_super+0x746/0xaf0 [erofs] vfs_get_super+0x7d/0x100 get_tree_nodev+0x16/0x20 erofs_fc_get_tree+0x20/0x30 [erofs] vfs_get_tree+0x24/0xb0 path_mount+0x2fa/0xa90 do_mount+0x7c/0xa0 __x64_sys_mount+0x8b/0xe0 do_syscall_64+0x30/0x60 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0 Considering that wake_up_bit() is more selective, so fix it by using wait_on_bit() instead of wait_var_event() to wait for the freeing of relinquished volume. In addition because waitqueue_active() is used in wake_up_bit() and clear_bit() doesn't imply any memory barrier, use clear_and_wake_up_bit() to add the missing memory barrier between cursor->flags and waitqueue_active(). Fixes: 62ab63352350 ("fscache: Implement volume registration") Reviewed-by: Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230113115211.2895845-2-houtao@huaweicloud.com/ # v3
Diffstat (limited to 'fs')
-rw-r--r--fs/fscache/volume.c11
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/fs/fscache/volume.c b/fs/fscache/volume.c
index ab8ceddf9efa..903af9d85f8b 100644
--- a/fs/fscache/volume.c
+++ b/fs/fscache/volume.c
@@ -141,13 +141,14 @@ static bool fscache_is_acquire_pending(struct fscache_volume *volume)
static void fscache_wait_on_volume_collision(struct fscache_volume *candidate,
unsigned int collidee_debug_id)
{
- wait_var_event_timeout(&candidate->flags,
- !fscache_is_acquire_pending(candidate), 20 * HZ);
+ wait_on_bit_timeout(&candidate->flags, FSCACHE_VOLUME_ACQUIRE_PENDING,
+ TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE, 20 * HZ);
if (fscache_is_acquire_pending(candidate)) {
pr_notice("Potential volume collision new=%08x old=%08x",
candidate->debug_id, collidee_debug_id);
fscache_stat(&fscache_n_volumes_collision);
- wait_var_event(&candidate->flags, !fscache_is_acquire_pending(candidate));
+ wait_on_bit(&candidate->flags, FSCACHE_VOLUME_ACQUIRE_PENDING,
+ TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
}
}
@@ -347,8 +348,8 @@ static void fscache_wake_pending_volume(struct fscache_volume *volume,
hlist_bl_for_each_entry(cursor, p, h, hash_link) {
if (fscache_volume_same(cursor, volume)) {
fscache_see_volume(cursor, fscache_volume_see_hash_wake);
- clear_bit(FSCACHE_VOLUME_ACQUIRE_PENDING, &cursor->flags);
- wake_up_bit(&cursor->flags, FSCACHE_VOLUME_ACQUIRE_PENDING);
+ clear_and_wake_up_bit(FSCACHE_VOLUME_ACQUIRE_PENDING,
+ &cursor->flags);
return;
}
}