summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>2020-07-11 00:27:49 -0400
committerAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>2020-08-20 15:45:15 -0400
commitc693cc4676a055c4126e487b30b0a96ea7ec9936 (patch)
tree8f057e3923deeffd1405e40e7ab1c056fa204189 /fs
parent99a2c96d52d312b11a943372964226fa134de3b1 (diff)
saner calling conventions for csum_and_copy_..._user()
All callers of these primitives will * discard anything we might've copied in case of error * ignore the csum value in case of error * always pass 0xffffffff as the initial sum, so the resulting csum value (in case of success, that is) will never be 0. That suggest the following calling conventions: * don't pass err_ptr - just return 0 on error. * don't bother with zeroing destination, etc. in case of error * don't pass the initial sum - just use 0xffffffff. This commit does the minimal conversion in the instances of csum_and_copy_...(); the changes of actual asm code behind them are done later in the series. Note that this asm code is often shared with csum_partial_copy_nocheck(); the difference is that csum_partial_copy_nocheck() passes 0 for initial sum while csum_and_copy_..._user() pass 0xffffffff. Fortunately, we are free to pass 0xffffffff in all cases and subsequent patches will use that freedom without any special comments. A part that could be split off: parisc and uml/i386 claimed to have csum_and_copy_to_user() instances of their own, but those were identical to the generic one, so we simply drop them. Not sure if it's worth a separate commit... Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions