diff options
| author | Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@gmail.com> | 2022-04-29 14:37:57 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | akpm <akpm@linux-foundation.org> | 2022-04-29 14:37:57 -0700 |
| commit | 81cd1ae909e0080eb41457766f0f448fd8ab9979 (patch) | |
| tree | 891ceea91edba950733a1632529dc873447165d1 /fs/ocfs2/dlm | |
| parent | dec81a532027a77bd52f9bd8d8b3230843533d3f (diff) | |
ocfs2: replace usage of found with dedicated list iterator variable
To move the list iterator variable into the list_for_each_entry_*() macro
in the future it should be avoided to use the list iterator variable after
the loop body.
To *never* use the list iterator variable after the loop it was concluded
to use a separate iterator variable instead of a found boolean [1].
This removes the need to use a found variable and simply checking if the
variable was set, can determine if the break/goto was hit.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAHk-=wgRr_D8CB-D9Kg-c=EHreAsk5SqXPwr9Y7k9sA6cWXJ6w@mail.gmail.com/
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220324071650.61168-1-jakobkoschel@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mark@fasheh.com>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
Cc: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com>
Cc: Changwei Ge <gechangwei@live.cn>
Cc: Gang He <ghe@suse.com>
Cc: Jun Piao <piaojun@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/ocfs2/dlm')
| -rw-r--r-- | fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmunlock.c | 21 |
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmunlock.c b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmunlock.c index 61103b2d69fb..7318e4794ef9 100644 --- a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmunlock.c +++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmunlock.c @@ -392,9 +392,9 @@ int dlm_unlock_lock_handler(struct o2net_msg *msg, u32 len, void *data, struct dlm_ctxt *dlm = data; struct dlm_unlock_lock *unlock = (struct dlm_unlock_lock *)msg->buf; struct dlm_lock_resource *res = NULL; - struct dlm_lock *lock = NULL; + struct dlm_lock *lock = NULL, *iter; enum dlm_status status = DLM_NORMAL; - int found = 0, i; + int i; struct dlm_lockstatus *lksb = NULL; int ignore; u32 flags; @@ -437,7 +437,6 @@ int dlm_unlock_lock_handler(struct o2net_msg *msg, u32 len, void *data, } queue=&res->granted; - found = 0; spin_lock(&res->spinlock); if (res->state & DLM_LOCK_RES_RECOVERING) { spin_unlock(&res->spinlock); @@ -461,21 +460,21 @@ int dlm_unlock_lock_handler(struct o2net_msg *msg, u32 len, void *data, } for (i=0; i<3; i++) { - list_for_each_entry(lock, queue, list) { - if (lock->ml.cookie == unlock->cookie && - lock->ml.node == unlock->node_idx) { - dlm_lock_get(lock); - found = 1; + list_for_each_entry(iter, queue, list) { + if (iter->ml.cookie == unlock->cookie && + iter->ml.node == unlock->node_idx) { + dlm_lock_get(iter); + lock = iter; break; } } - if (found) + if (lock) break; /* scan granted -> converting -> blocked queues */ queue++; } spin_unlock(&res->spinlock); - if (!found) { + if (!lock) { status = DLM_IVLOCKID; goto not_found; } @@ -505,7 +504,7 @@ int dlm_unlock_lock_handler(struct o2net_msg *msg, u32 len, void *data, dlm_kick_thread(dlm, res); not_found: - if (!found) + if (!lock) mlog(ML_ERROR, "failed to find lock to unlock! " "cookie=%u:%llu\n", dlm_get_lock_cookie_node(be64_to_cpu(unlock->cookie)), |