diff options
author | Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> | 2011-07-13 13:09:25 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> | 2011-07-21 18:01:46 +0200 |
commit | 9763b67fb9f3050c6da739105888327587c30c4d (patch) | |
tree | 822e6a5243c3d872f86d9c9b980896bc4cd8a491 /fs/nfsd | |
parent | 9598c82dcacadc3b9daa8170613fd054c6124d30 (diff) |
sched, cgroup: Optimize load_balance_fair()
Use for_each_leaf_cfs_rq() instead of list_for_each_entry_rcu(), this
achieves that load_balance_fair() only iterates those task_groups that
actually have tasks on busiest, and that we iterate bottom-up, trying to
move light groups before the heavier ones.
No idea if it will actually work out to be beneficial in practice, does
anybody have a cgroup workload that might show a difference one way or
the other?
[ Also move update_h_load to sched_fair.c, loosing #ifdef-ery ]
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Reviewed-by: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1310557009.2586.28.camel@twins
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/nfsd')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions