diff options
| author | Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> | 2021-11-02 15:17:24 -0400 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> | 2021-11-02 14:39:20 -0500 |
| commit | 6c2e3bf68f3e5e5a647aa52be246d5f552d7496d (patch) | |
| tree | 5a6eeb323966d0a70c2e841d63604a0f5782d368 /fs/dlm/lock.c | |
| parent | 63eab2b00bcff620682e8570367458c9619a9970 (diff) | |
fs: dlm: filter user dlm messages for kernel locks
This patch fixes the following crash by receiving a invalid message:
[ 160.672220] ==================================================================
[ 160.676206] BUG: KASAN: user-memory-access in dlm_user_add_ast+0xc3/0x370
[ 160.679659] Read of size 8 at addr 00000000deadbeef by task kworker/u32:13/319
[ 160.681447]
[ 160.681824] CPU: 10 PID: 319 Comm: kworker/u32:13 Not tainted 5.14.0-rc2+ #399
[ 160.683472] Hardware name: Red Hat KVM/RHEL-AV, BIOS 1.14.0-1.module+el8.6.0+12648+6ede71a5 04/01/2014
[ 160.685574] Workqueue: dlm_recv process_recv_sockets
[ 160.686721] Call Trace:
[ 160.687310] dump_stack_lvl+0x56/0x6f
[ 160.688169] ? dlm_user_add_ast+0xc3/0x370
[ 160.689116] kasan_report.cold.14+0x116/0x11b
[ 160.690138] ? dlm_user_add_ast+0xc3/0x370
[ 160.690832] dlm_user_add_ast+0xc3/0x370
[ 160.691502] _receive_unlock_reply+0x103/0x170
[ 160.692241] _receive_message+0x11df/0x1ec0
[ 160.692926] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0xa1/0xd0
[ 160.693700] ? rcu_read_lock_bh_held+0xb0/0xb0
[ 160.694427] ? lock_acquire+0x175/0x400
[ 160.695058] ? do_purge.isra.51+0x200/0x200
[ 160.695744] ? lock_acquired+0x360/0x5d0
[ 160.696400] ? lock_contended+0x6a0/0x6a0
[ 160.697055] ? lock_release+0x21d/0x5e0
[ 160.697686] ? lock_is_held_type+0xe0/0x110
[ 160.698352] ? lock_is_held_type+0xe0/0x110
[ 160.699026] ? ___might_sleep+0x1cc/0x1e0
[ 160.699698] ? dlm_wait_requestqueue+0x94/0x140
[ 160.700451] ? dlm_process_requestqueue+0x240/0x240
[ 160.701249] ? down_write_killable+0x2b0/0x2b0
[ 160.701988] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0xa2/0x130
[ 160.702690] dlm_receive_buffer+0x1a5/0x210
[ 160.703385] dlm_process_incoming_buffer+0x726/0x9f0
[ 160.704210] receive_from_sock+0x1c0/0x3b0
[ 160.704886] ? dlm_tcp_shutdown+0x30/0x30
[ 160.705561] ? lock_acquire+0x175/0x400
[ 160.706197] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0xa1/0xd0
[ 160.706941] ? rcu_read_lock_bh_held+0xb0/0xb0
[ 160.707681] process_recv_sockets+0x32/0x40
[ 160.708366] process_one_work+0x55e/0xad0
[ 160.709045] ? pwq_dec_nr_in_flight+0x110/0x110
[ 160.709820] worker_thread+0x65/0x5e0
[ 160.710423] ? process_one_work+0xad0/0xad0
[ 160.711087] kthread+0x1ed/0x220
[ 160.711628] ? set_kthread_struct+0x80/0x80
[ 160.712314] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
The issue is that we received a DLM message for a user lock but the
destination lock is a kernel lock. Note that the address which is trying
to derefence is 00000000deadbeef, which is in a kernel lock
lkb->lkb_astparam, this field should never be derefenced by the DLM
kernel stack. In case of a user lock lkb->lkb_astparam is lkb->lkb_ua
(memory is shared by a union field). The struct lkb_ua will be handled
by the DLM kernel stack but on a kernel lock it will contain invalid
data and ends in most likely crashing the kernel.
It can be reproduced with two cluster nodes.
node 2:
dlm_tool join test
echo "862 fooobaar 1 2 1" > /sys/kernel/debug/dlm/test_locks
echo "862 3 1" > /sys/kernel/debug/dlm/test_waiters
node 1:
dlm_tool join test
python:
foo = DLM(h_cmd=3, o_nextcmd=1, h_nodeid=1, h_lockspace=0x77222027, \
m_type=7, m_flags=0x1, m_remid=0x862, m_result=0xFFFEFFFE)
newFile = open("/sys/kernel/debug/dlm/comms/2/rawmsg", "wb")
newFile.write(bytes(foo))
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/dlm/lock.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | fs/dlm/lock.c | 9 |
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/fs/dlm/lock.c b/fs/dlm/lock.c index 0dbe273566c0..54705d367076 100644 --- a/fs/dlm/lock.c +++ b/fs/dlm/lock.c @@ -3989,6 +3989,14 @@ static int validate_message(struct dlm_lkb *lkb, struct dlm_message *ms) int from = ms->m_header.h_nodeid; int error = 0; + /* currently mixing of user/kernel locks are not supported */ + if (ms->m_flags & DLM_IFL_USER && ~lkb->lkb_flags & DLM_IFL_USER) { + log_error(lkb->lkb_resource->res_ls, + "got user dlm message for a kernel lock"); + error = -EINVAL; + goto out; + } + switch (ms->m_type) { case DLM_MSG_CONVERT: case DLM_MSG_UNLOCK: @@ -4017,6 +4025,7 @@ static int validate_message(struct dlm_lkb *lkb, struct dlm_message *ms) error = -EINVAL; } +out: if (error) log_error(lkb->lkb_resource->res_ls, "ignore invalid message %d from %d %x %x %x %d", |