summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorChuanxiao Dong <chuanxiao.dong@intel.com>2017-07-07 13:21:52 +0800
committerZhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>2017-07-11 13:46:58 +0800
commit08673c3e27aa4407899e4fbb4738dac25370f706 (patch)
treeddd9217207927fdbacb917f7bcce0e7a6167ae56 /drivers
parent3364bf5fd00f0391ad090f547932a5c4b2068dbc (diff)
drm/i915/gvt: Revert "drm/i915/gvt: Fix possible recursive locking issue"
This reverts commit 62d02fd1f807bf5a259a242c483c9fb98a242630. The rwsem recursive trace should not be fixed from kvmgt side by using a workqueue and it is an issue should be fixed in VFIO. So this one should be reverted. Signed-off-by: Chuanxiao Dong <chuanxiao.dong@intel.com> Cc: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.10+ Signed-off-by: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers')
-rw-r--r--drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/gvt.h3
-rw-r--r--drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c55
2 files changed, 10 insertions, 48 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/gvt.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/gvt.h
index 28d817e96e58..3a74e79eac2f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/gvt.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/gvt.h
@@ -182,9 +182,6 @@ struct intel_vgpu {
struct kvm *kvm;
struct work_struct release_work;
atomic_t released;
- struct work_struct unpin_work;
- spinlock_t unpin_lock; /* To protect unpin_list */
- struct list_head unpin_list;
} vdev;
#endif
};
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
index 75a6e1d8af0d..fd0c85f9ef3c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
@@ -78,7 +78,6 @@ struct gvt_dma {
struct rb_node node;
gfn_t gfn;
unsigned long iova;
- struct list_head list;
};
static inline bool handle_valid(unsigned long handle)
@@ -167,7 +166,6 @@ static void gvt_cache_add(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu, gfn_t gfn,
new->gfn = gfn;
new->iova = iova;
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&new->list);
mutex_lock(&vgpu->vdev.cache_lock);
while (*link) {
@@ -199,52 +197,26 @@ static void __gvt_cache_remove_entry(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu,
kfree(entry);
}
-static void intel_vgpu_unpin_work(struct work_struct *work)
+static void gvt_cache_remove(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu, gfn_t gfn)
{
- struct intel_vgpu *vgpu = container_of(work, struct intel_vgpu,
- vdev.unpin_work);
struct device *dev = mdev_dev(vgpu->vdev.mdev);
struct gvt_dma *this;
- unsigned long gfn;
-
- for (;;) {
- spin_lock(&vgpu->vdev.unpin_lock);
- if (list_empty(&vgpu->vdev.unpin_list)) {
- spin_unlock(&vgpu->vdev.unpin_lock);
- break;
- }
- this = list_first_entry(&vgpu->vdev.unpin_list,
- struct gvt_dma, list);
- list_del(&this->list);
- spin_unlock(&vgpu->vdev.unpin_lock);
-
- gfn = this->gfn;
- vfio_unpin_pages(dev, &gfn, 1);
- kfree(this);
- }
-}
-
-static bool gvt_cache_mark_remove(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu, gfn_t gfn)
-{
- struct gvt_dma *this;
+ unsigned long g1;
+ int rc;
mutex_lock(&vgpu->vdev.cache_lock);
this = __gvt_cache_find(vgpu, gfn);
if (!this) {
mutex_unlock(&vgpu->vdev.cache_lock);
- return false;
+ return;
}
+
+ g1 = gfn;
gvt_dma_unmap_iova(vgpu, this->iova);
- /* remove this from rb tree */
- rb_erase(&this->node, &vgpu->vdev.cache);
+ rc = vfio_unpin_pages(dev, &g1, 1);
+ WARN_ON(rc != 1);
+ __gvt_cache_remove_entry(vgpu, this);
mutex_unlock(&vgpu->vdev.cache_lock);
-
- /* put this to the unpin_list */
- spin_lock(&vgpu->vdev.unpin_lock);
- list_move_tail(&this->list, &vgpu->vdev.unpin_list);
- spin_unlock(&vgpu->vdev.unpin_lock);
-
- return true;
}
static void gvt_cache_init(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu)
@@ -485,9 +457,6 @@ static int intel_vgpu_create(struct kobject *kobj, struct mdev_device *mdev)
}
INIT_WORK(&vgpu->vdev.release_work, intel_vgpu_release_work);
- INIT_WORK(&vgpu->vdev.unpin_work, intel_vgpu_unpin_work);
- spin_lock_init(&vgpu->vdev.unpin_lock);
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vgpu->vdev.unpin_list);
vgpu->vdev.mdev = mdev;
mdev_set_drvdata(mdev, vgpu);
@@ -517,7 +486,6 @@ static int intel_vgpu_iommu_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
struct intel_vgpu *vgpu = container_of(nb,
struct intel_vgpu,
vdev.iommu_notifier);
- bool sched_unmap = false;
if (action == VFIO_IOMMU_NOTIFY_DMA_UNMAP) {
struct vfio_iommu_type1_dma_unmap *unmap = data;
@@ -527,10 +495,7 @@ static int intel_vgpu_iommu_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
end_gfn = gfn + unmap->size / PAGE_SIZE;
while (gfn < end_gfn)
- sched_unmap |= gvt_cache_mark_remove(vgpu, gfn++);
-
- if (sched_unmap)
- schedule_work(&vgpu->vdev.unpin_work);
+ gvt_cache_remove(vgpu, gfn++);
}
return NOTIFY_OK;