summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/gpu
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorLyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>2023-07-28 18:58:57 -0400
committerKarol Herbst <kherbst@redhat.com>2023-08-03 11:52:48 +0200
commite4060dad253352382b20420d8ef98daab24dbc17 (patch)
treedbf5d22c8d5e7ff2b66a15be8a82258954a1c53e /drivers/gpu
parent1cb9e2ef66d53b020842b18762e30d0eb4384de8 (diff)
drm/nouveau/nvkm/dp: Add workaround to fix DP 1.3+ DPCD issues
Currently we use the drm_dp_dpcd_read_caps() helper in the DRM side of nouveau in order to read the DPCD of a DP connector, which makes sure we do the right thing and also check for extended DPCD caps. However, it turns out we're not currently doing this on the nvkm side since we don't have access to the drm_dp_aux structure there - which means that the DRM side of the driver and the NVKM side can end up with different DPCD capabilities for the same connector. Ideally in order to fix this, we just want to use the drm_dp_read_dpcd_caps() helper in nouveau. That's not currently possible though, and is going to depend on having a bunch of the DP code moved out of nvkm and into the DRM side of things as part of the GSP enablement work. Until then however, let's workaround this problem by porting a copy of drm_dp_read_dpcd_caps() into NVKM - which should fix this issue. Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Karol Herbst <kherbst@redhat.com> Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/nouveau/-/issues/211 Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230728225858.350581-1-lyude@redhat.com (cherry picked from commit cc4adf3a7323212f303bc9ff0f96346c44fcba06 in drm-misc-next) Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 6.3+ Signed-off-by: Karol Herbst <kherbst@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/gpu')
-rw-r--r--drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/disp/dp.c48
1 files changed, 47 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/disp/dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/disp/dp.c
index 40c8ea43c42f..b8ac66b4a2c4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/disp/dp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/disp/dp.c
@@ -26,6 +26,8 @@
#include "head.h"
#include "ior.h"
+#include <drm/display/drm_dp.h>
+
#include <subdev/bios.h>
#include <subdev/bios/init.h>
#include <subdev/gpio.h>
@@ -634,6 +636,50 @@ nvkm_dp_enable_supported_link_rates(struct nvkm_outp *outp)
return outp->dp.rates != 0;
}
+/* XXX: This is a big fat hack, and this is just drm_dp_read_dpcd_caps()
+ * converted to work inside nvkm. This is a temporary holdover until we start
+ * passing the drm_dp_aux device through NVKM
+ */
+static int
+nvkm_dp_read_dpcd_caps(struct nvkm_outp *outp)
+{
+ struct nvkm_i2c_aux *aux = outp->dp.aux;
+ u8 dpcd_ext[DP_RECEIVER_CAP_SIZE];
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = nvkm_rdaux(aux, DPCD_RC00_DPCD_REV, outp->dp.dpcd, DP_RECEIVER_CAP_SIZE);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+
+ /*
+ * Prior to DP1.3 the bit represented by
+ * DP_EXTENDED_RECEIVER_CAP_FIELD_PRESENT was reserved.
+ * If it is set DP_DPCD_REV at 0000h could be at a value less than
+ * the true capability of the panel. The only way to check is to
+ * then compare 0000h and 2200h.
+ */
+ if (!(outp->dp.dpcd[DP_TRAINING_AUX_RD_INTERVAL] &
+ DP_EXTENDED_RECEIVER_CAP_FIELD_PRESENT))
+ return 0;
+
+ ret = nvkm_rdaux(aux, DP_DP13_DPCD_REV, dpcd_ext, sizeof(dpcd_ext));
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+
+ if (outp->dp.dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV] > dpcd_ext[DP_DPCD_REV]) {
+ OUTP_DBG(outp, "Extended DPCD rev less than base DPCD rev (%d > %d)\n",
+ outp->dp.dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV], dpcd_ext[DP_DPCD_REV]);
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ if (!memcmp(outp->dp.dpcd, dpcd_ext, sizeof(dpcd_ext)))
+ return 0;
+
+ memcpy(outp->dp.dpcd, dpcd_ext, sizeof(dpcd_ext));
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
void
nvkm_dp_enable(struct nvkm_outp *outp, bool auxpwr)
{
@@ -689,7 +735,7 @@ nvkm_dp_enable(struct nvkm_outp *outp, bool auxpwr)
memset(outp->dp.lttpr, 0x00, sizeof(outp->dp.lttpr));
}
- if (!nvkm_rdaux(aux, DPCD_RC00_DPCD_REV, outp->dp.dpcd, sizeof(outp->dp.dpcd))) {
+ if (!nvkm_dp_read_dpcd_caps(outp)) {
const u8 rates[] = { 0x1e, 0x14, 0x0a, 0x06, 0 };
const u8 *rate;
int rate_max;