diff options
author | Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> | 2022-05-19 12:52:30 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> | 2022-05-19 06:52:36 -0600 |
commit | c5ac56bb6110e42e79d3106866658376b2e48ab9 (patch) | |
tree | b0deddac8e7dcbedc254aab05e0500842a905ead /block | |
parent | f950667356ce90a41b446b726d4595a10cb65415 (diff) |
bfq: Allow current waker to defend against a tentative one
The code in bfq_check_waker() ignores wake up events from the current
waker. This makes it more likely we select a new tentative waker
although the current one is generating more wake up events. Treat
current waker the same way as any other process and allow it to reset
the waker detection logic.
Fixes: 71217df39dc6 ("block, bfq: make waker-queue detection more robust")
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220519105235.31397-2-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Diffstat (limited to 'block')
-rw-r--r-- | block/bfq-iosched.c | 3 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c index 7545f589d8c3..9e1d713de942 100644 --- a/block/bfq-iosched.c +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c @@ -2129,8 +2129,7 @@ static void bfq_check_waker(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq, if (!bfqd->last_completed_rq_bfqq || bfqd->last_completed_rq_bfqq == bfqq || bfq_bfqq_has_short_ttime(bfqq) || - now_ns - bfqd->last_completion >= 4 * NSEC_PER_MSEC || - bfqd->last_completed_rq_bfqq == bfqq->waker_bfqq) + now_ns - bfqd->last_completion >= 4 * NSEC_PER_MSEC) return; /* |