diff options
author | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2020-04-08 21:03:40 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2020-04-08 21:03:40 -0700 |
commit | 9b06860d7c1f1f4cb7d70f92e47dfa4a91bd5007 (patch) | |
tree | 120882e574394ce3b11bd491533613b4488fae45 /arch/x86 | |
parent | 0906d8b975ff713cfb55328e4f3bf6de5967415e (diff) | |
parent | f6d2b802f80d0ca89ee1f51c1781b3f79cdb25d5 (diff) |
Merge tag 'libnvdimm-for-5.7' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/nvdimm/nvdimm
Pull libnvdimm and dax updates from Dan Williams:
"There were multiple touches outside of drivers/nvdimm/ this round to
add cross arch compatibility to the devm_memremap_pages() interface,
enhance numa information for persistent memory ranges, and add a
zero_page_range() dax operation.
This cycle I switched from the patchwork api to Konstantin's b4 script
for collecting tags (from x86, PowerPC, filesystem, and device-mapper
folks), and everything looks to have gone ok there. This has all
appeared in -next with no reported issues.
Summary:
- Add support for region alignment configuration and enforcement to
fix compatibility across architectures and PowerPC page size
configurations.
- Introduce 'zero_page_range' as a dax operation. This facilitates
filesystem-dax operation without a block-device.
- Introduce phys_to_target_node() to facilitate drivers that want to
know resulting numa node if a given reserved address range was
onlined.
- Advertise a persistence-domain for of_pmem and papr_scm. The
persistence domain indicates where cpu-store cycles need to reach
in the platform-memory subsystem before the platform will consider
them power-fail protected.
- Promote numa_map_to_online_node() to a cross-kernel generic
facility.
- Save x86 numa information to allow for node-id lookups for reserved
memory ranges, deploy that capability for the e820-pmem driver.
- Pick up some miscellaneous minor fixes, that missed v5.6-final,
including a some smatch reports in the ioctl path and some unit
test compilation fixups.
- Fixup some flexible-array declarations"
* tag 'libnvdimm-for-5.7' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/nvdimm/nvdimm: (29 commits)
dax: Move mandatory ->zero_page_range() check in alloc_dax()
dax,iomap: Add helper dax_iomap_zero() to zero a range
dax: Use new dax zero page method for zeroing a page
dm,dax: Add dax zero_page_range operation
s390,dcssblk,dax: Add dax zero_page_range operation to dcssblk driver
dax, pmem: Add a dax operation zero_page_range
pmem: Add functions for reading/writing page to/from pmem
libnvdimm: Update persistence domain value for of_pmem and papr_scm device
tools/test/nvdimm: Fix out of tree build
libnvdimm/region: Fix build error
libnvdimm/region: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member
libnvdimm/label: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member
ACPI: NFIT: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member
libnvdimm/region: Introduce an 'align' attribute
libnvdimm/region: Introduce NDD_LABELING
libnvdimm/namespace: Enforce memremap_compat_align()
libnvdimm/pfn: Prevent raw mode fallback if pfn-infoblock valid
libnvdimm: Out of bounds read in __nd_ioctl()
acpi/nfit: improve bounds checking for 'func'
mm/memremap_pages: Introduce memremap_compat_align()
...
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/x86')
-rw-r--r-- | arch/x86/Kconfig | 1 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | arch/x86/mm/numa.c | 67 |
2 files changed, 53 insertions, 15 deletions
diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig index 8d078642b4be..0163d764ade4 100644 --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig @@ -1661,6 +1661,7 @@ config X86_PMEM_LEGACY depends on PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT depends on BLK_DEV select X86_PMEM_LEGACY_DEVICE + select NUMA_KEEP_MEMINFO if NUMA select LIBNVDIMM help Treat memory marked using the non-standard e820 type of 12 as used diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c index 99f7a68738f0..59ba008504dc 100644 --- a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c +++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c @@ -25,11 +25,8 @@ nodemask_t numa_nodes_parsed __initdata; struct pglist_data *node_data[MAX_NUMNODES] __read_mostly; EXPORT_SYMBOL(node_data); -static struct numa_meminfo numa_meminfo -#ifndef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG -__initdata -#endif -; +static struct numa_meminfo numa_meminfo __initdata_or_meminfo; +static struct numa_meminfo numa_reserved_meminfo __initdata_or_meminfo; static int numa_distance_cnt; static u8 *numa_distance; @@ -169,6 +166,19 @@ void __init numa_remove_memblk_from(int idx, struct numa_meminfo *mi) } /** + * numa_move_tail_memblk - Move a numa_memblk from one numa_meminfo to another + * @dst: numa_meminfo to append block to + * @idx: Index of memblk to remove + * @src: numa_meminfo to remove memblk from + */ +static void __init numa_move_tail_memblk(struct numa_meminfo *dst, int idx, + struct numa_meminfo *src) +{ + dst->blk[dst->nr_blks++] = src->blk[idx]; + numa_remove_memblk_from(idx, src); +} + +/** * numa_add_memblk - Add one numa_memblk to numa_meminfo * @nid: NUMA node ID of the new memblk * @start: Start address of the new memblk @@ -237,14 +247,19 @@ int __init numa_cleanup_meminfo(struct numa_meminfo *mi) for (i = 0; i < mi->nr_blks; i++) { struct numa_memblk *bi = &mi->blk[i]; - /* make sure all blocks are inside the limits */ + /* move / save reserved memory ranges */ + if (!memblock_overlaps_region(&memblock.memory, + bi->start, bi->end - bi->start)) { + numa_move_tail_memblk(&numa_reserved_meminfo, i--, mi); + continue; + } + + /* make sure all non-reserved blocks are inside the limits */ bi->start = max(bi->start, low); bi->end = min(bi->end, high); - /* and there's no empty or non-exist block */ - if (bi->start >= bi->end || - !memblock_overlaps_region(&memblock.memory, - bi->start, bi->end - bi->start)) + /* and there's no empty block */ + if (bi->start >= bi->end) numa_remove_memblk_from(i--, mi); } @@ -881,16 +896,38 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpumask_of_node); #endif /* !CONFIG_DEBUG_PER_CPU_MAPS */ -#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG -int memory_add_physaddr_to_nid(u64 start) +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_KEEP_MEMINFO +static int meminfo_to_nid(struct numa_meminfo *mi, u64 start) { - struct numa_meminfo *mi = &numa_meminfo; - int nid = mi->blk[0].nid; int i; for (i = 0; i < mi->nr_blks; i++) if (mi->blk[i].start <= start && mi->blk[i].end > start) - nid = mi->blk[i].nid; + return mi->blk[i].nid; + return NUMA_NO_NODE; +} + +int phys_to_target_node(phys_addr_t start) +{ + int nid = meminfo_to_nid(&numa_meminfo, start); + + /* + * Prefer online nodes, but if reserved memory might be + * hot-added continue the search with reserved ranges. + */ + if (nid != NUMA_NO_NODE) + return nid; + + return meminfo_to_nid(&numa_reserved_meminfo, start); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(phys_to_target_node); + +int memory_add_physaddr_to_nid(u64 start) +{ + int nid = meminfo_to_nid(&numa_meminfo, start); + + if (nid == NUMA_NO_NODE) + nid = numa_meminfo.blk[0].nid; return nid; } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(memory_add_physaddr_to_nid); |