diff options
author | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2023-01-13 14:41:50 -0600 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2023-01-13 14:41:50 -0600 |
commit | 92783a90bcbde8659dd4a160506c46c56db494d6 (patch) | |
tree | 080a6edd7cf645b404a7b0ea28abba60c2942d16 /arch/x86 | |
parent | f5fe24ef17b5fbe6db49534163e77499fb10ae8c (diff) | |
parent | 310bc39546a435c83cc27a0eba878afac0d74714 (diff) |
Merge tag 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm
Pull kvm fixes from Paolo Bonzini:
"ARM:
- Fix the PMCR_EL0 reset value after the PMU rework
- Correctly handle S2 fault triggered by a S1 page table walk by not
always classifying it as a write, as this breaks on R/O memslots
- Document why we cannot exit with KVM_EXIT_MMIO when taking a write
fault from a S1 PTW on a R/O memslot
- Put the Apple M2 on the naughty list for not being able to
correctly implement the vgic SEIS feature, just like the M1 before
it
- Reviewer updates: Alex is stepping down, replaced by Zenghui
x86:
- Fix various rare locking issues in Xen emulation and teach lockdep
to detect them
- Documentation improvements
- Do not return host topology information from KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID"
* tag 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm:
KVM: x86/xen: Avoid deadlock by adding kvm->arch.xen.xen_lock leaf node lock
KVM: Ensure lockdep knows about kvm->lock vs. vcpu->mutex ordering rule
KVM: x86/xen: Fix potential deadlock in kvm_xen_update_runstate_guest()
KVM: x86/xen: Fix lockdep warning on "recursive" gpc locking
Documentation: kvm: fix SRCU locking order docs
KVM: x86: Do not return host topology information from KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID
KVM: nSVM: clarify recalc_intercepts() wrt CR8
MAINTAINERS: Remove myself as a KVM/arm64 reviewer
MAINTAINERS: Add Zenghui Yu as a KVM/arm64 reviewer
KVM: arm64: vgic: Add Apple M2 cpus to the list of broken SEIS implementations
KVM: arm64: Convert FSC_* over to ESR_ELx_FSC_*
KVM: arm64: Document the behaviour of S1PTW faults on RO memslots
KVM: arm64: Fix S1PTW handling on RO memslots
KVM: arm64: PMU: Fix PMCR_EL0 reset value
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/x86')
-rw-r--r-- | arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c | 32 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c | 12 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | arch/x86/kvm/xen.c | 90 |
4 files changed, 72 insertions, 63 deletions
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h index f35f1ff4427b..6aaae18f1854 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h @@ -1111,6 +1111,7 @@ struct msr_bitmap_range { /* Xen emulation context */ struct kvm_xen { + struct mutex xen_lock; u32 xen_version; bool long_mode; bool runstate_update_flag; diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c index b14653b61470..596061c1610e 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c @@ -770,16 +770,22 @@ struct kvm_cpuid_array { int nent; }; +static struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *get_next_cpuid(struct kvm_cpuid_array *array) +{ + if (array->nent >= array->maxnent) + return NULL; + + return &array->entries[array->nent++]; +} + static struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *do_host_cpuid(struct kvm_cpuid_array *array, u32 function, u32 index) { - struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *entry; + struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *entry = get_next_cpuid(array); - if (array->nent >= array->maxnent) + if (!entry) return NULL; - entry = &array->entries[array->nent++]; - memset(entry, 0, sizeof(*entry)); entry->function = function; entry->index = index; @@ -956,22 +962,13 @@ static inline int __do_cpuid_func(struct kvm_cpuid_array *array, u32 function) entry->edx = edx.full; break; } - /* - * Per Intel's SDM, the 0x1f is a superset of 0xb, - * thus they can be handled by common code. - */ case 0x1f: case 0xb: /* - * Populate entries until the level type (ECX[15:8]) of the - * previous entry is zero. Note, CPUID EAX.{0x1f,0xb}.0 is - * the starting entry, filled by the primary do_host_cpuid(). + * No topology; a valid topology is indicated by the presence + * of subleaf 1. */ - for (i = 1; entry->ecx & 0xff00; ++i) { - entry = do_host_cpuid(array, function, i); - if (!entry) - goto out; - } + entry->eax = entry->ebx = entry->ecx = 0; break; case 0xd: { u64 permitted_xcr0 = kvm_caps.supported_xcr0 & xstate_get_guest_group_perm(); @@ -1202,6 +1199,9 @@ static inline int __do_cpuid_func(struct kvm_cpuid_array *array, u32 function) entry->ebx = entry->ecx = entry->edx = 0; break; case 0x8000001e: + /* Do not return host topology information. */ + entry->eax = entry->ebx = entry->ecx = 0; + entry->edx = 0; /* reserved */ break; case 0x8000001F: if (!kvm_cpu_cap_has(X86_FEATURE_SEV)) { diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c index bc9cd7086fa9..add65dd59756 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c @@ -138,15 +138,13 @@ void recalc_intercepts(struct vcpu_svm *svm) c->intercepts[i] = h->intercepts[i]; if (g->int_ctl & V_INTR_MASKING_MASK) { - /* We only want the cr8 intercept bits of L1 */ - vmcb_clr_intercept(c, INTERCEPT_CR8_READ); - vmcb_clr_intercept(c, INTERCEPT_CR8_WRITE); - /* - * Once running L2 with HF_VINTR_MASK, EFLAGS.IF does not - * affect any interrupt we may want to inject; therefore, - * interrupt window vmexits are irrelevant to L0. + * Once running L2 with HF_VINTR_MASK, EFLAGS.IF and CR8 + * does not affect any interrupt we may want to inject; + * therefore, writes to CR8 are irrelevant to L0, as are + * interrupt window vmexits. */ + vmcb_clr_intercept(c, INTERCEPT_CR8_WRITE); vmcb_clr_intercept(c, INTERCEPT_VINTR); } diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/xen.c b/arch/x86/kvm/xen.c index 2e29bdc2949c..8fd41f5deae3 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/xen.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/xen.c @@ -271,7 +271,15 @@ static void kvm_xen_update_runstate_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *v, bool atomic) * Attempt to obtain the GPC lock on *both* (if there are two) * gfn_to_pfn caches that cover the region. */ - read_lock_irqsave(&gpc1->lock, flags); + if (atomic) { + local_irq_save(flags); + if (!read_trylock(&gpc1->lock)) { + local_irq_restore(flags); + return; + } + } else { + read_lock_irqsave(&gpc1->lock, flags); + } while (!kvm_gpc_check(gpc1, user_len1)) { read_unlock_irqrestore(&gpc1->lock, flags); @@ -304,9 +312,18 @@ static void kvm_xen_update_runstate_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *v, bool atomic) * The guest's runstate_info is split across two pages and we * need to hold and validate both GPCs simultaneously. We can * declare a lock ordering GPC1 > GPC2 because nothing else - * takes them more than one at a time. + * takes them more than one at a time. Set a subclass on the + * gpc1 lock to make lockdep shut up about it. */ - read_lock(&gpc2->lock); + lock_set_subclass(&gpc1->lock.dep_map, 1, _THIS_IP_); + if (atomic) { + if (!read_trylock(&gpc2->lock)) { + read_unlock_irqrestore(&gpc1->lock, flags); + return; + } + } else { + read_lock(&gpc2->lock); + } if (!kvm_gpc_check(gpc2, user_len2)) { read_unlock(&gpc2->lock); @@ -590,26 +607,26 @@ int kvm_xen_hvm_set_attr(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_xen_hvm_attr *data) if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_64BIT) && data->u.long_mode) { r = -EINVAL; } else { - mutex_lock(&kvm->lock); + mutex_lock(&kvm->arch.xen.xen_lock); kvm->arch.xen.long_mode = !!data->u.long_mode; - mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock); + mutex_unlock(&kvm->arch.xen.xen_lock); r = 0; } break; case KVM_XEN_ATTR_TYPE_SHARED_INFO: - mutex_lock(&kvm->lock); + mutex_lock(&kvm->arch.xen.xen_lock); r = kvm_xen_shared_info_init(kvm, data->u.shared_info.gfn); - mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock); + mutex_unlock(&kvm->arch.xen.xen_lock); break; case KVM_XEN_ATTR_TYPE_UPCALL_VECTOR: if (data->u.vector && data->u.vector < 0x10) r = -EINVAL; else { - mutex_lock(&kvm->lock); + mutex_lock(&kvm->arch.xen.xen_lock); kvm->arch.xen.upcall_vector = data->u.vector; - mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock); + mutex_unlock(&kvm->arch.xen.xen_lock); r = 0; } break; @@ -619,9 +636,9 @@ int kvm_xen_hvm_set_attr(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_xen_hvm_attr *data) break; case KVM_XEN_ATTR_TYPE_XEN_VERSION: - mutex_lock(&kvm->lock); + mutex_lock(&kvm->arch.xen.xen_lock); kvm->arch.xen.xen_version = data->u.xen_version; - mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock); + mutex_unlock(&kvm->arch.xen.xen_lock); r = 0; break; @@ -630,9 +647,9 @@ int kvm_xen_hvm_set_attr(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_xen_hvm_attr *data) r = -EOPNOTSUPP; break; } - mutex_lock(&kvm->lock); + mutex_lock(&kvm->arch.xen.xen_lock); kvm->arch.xen.runstate_update_flag = !!data->u.runstate_update_flag; - mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock); + mutex_unlock(&kvm->arch.xen.xen_lock); r = 0; break; @@ -647,7 +664,7 @@ int kvm_xen_hvm_get_attr(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_xen_hvm_attr *data) { int r = -ENOENT; - mutex_lock(&kvm->lock); + mutex_lock(&kvm->arch.xen.xen_lock); switch (data->type) { case KVM_XEN_ATTR_TYPE_LONG_MODE: @@ -686,7 +703,7 @@ int kvm_xen_hvm_get_attr(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_xen_hvm_attr *data) break; } - mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock); + mutex_unlock(&kvm->arch.xen.xen_lock); return r; } @@ -694,7 +711,7 @@ int kvm_xen_vcpu_set_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_xen_vcpu_attr *data) { int idx, r = -ENOENT; - mutex_lock(&vcpu->kvm->lock); + mutex_lock(&vcpu->kvm->arch.xen.xen_lock); idx = srcu_read_lock(&vcpu->kvm->srcu); switch (data->type) { @@ -922,7 +939,7 @@ int kvm_xen_vcpu_set_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_xen_vcpu_attr *data) } srcu_read_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->srcu, idx); - mutex_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->lock); + mutex_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->arch.xen.xen_lock); return r; } @@ -930,7 +947,7 @@ int kvm_xen_vcpu_get_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_xen_vcpu_attr *data) { int r = -ENOENT; - mutex_lock(&vcpu->kvm->lock); + mutex_lock(&vcpu->kvm->arch.xen.xen_lock); switch (data->type) { case KVM_XEN_VCPU_ATTR_TYPE_VCPU_INFO: @@ -1013,7 +1030,7 @@ int kvm_xen_vcpu_get_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_xen_vcpu_attr *data) break; } - mutex_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->lock); + mutex_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->arch.xen.xen_lock); return r; } @@ -1106,7 +1123,7 @@ int kvm_xen_hvm_config(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_xen_hvm_config *xhc) xhc->blob_size_32 || xhc->blob_size_64)) return -EINVAL; - mutex_lock(&kvm->lock); + mutex_lock(&kvm->arch.xen.xen_lock); if (xhc->msr && !kvm->arch.xen_hvm_config.msr) static_branch_inc(&kvm_xen_enabled.key); @@ -1115,7 +1132,7 @@ int kvm_xen_hvm_config(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_xen_hvm_config *xhc) memcpy(&kvm->arch.xen_hvm_config, xhc, sizeof(*xhc)); - mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock); + mutex_unlock(&kvm->arch.xen.xen_lock); return 0; } @@ -1658,15 +1675,7 @@ static int kvm_xen_set_evtchn(struct kvm_xen_evtchn *xe, struct kvm *kvm) mm_borrowed = true; } - /* - * For the irqfd workqueue, using the main kvm->lock mutex is - * fine since this function is invoked from kvm_set_irq() with - * no other lock held, no srcu. In future if it will be called - * directly from a vCPU thread (e.g. on hypercall for an IPI) - * then it may need to switch to using a leaf-node mutex for - * serializing the shared_info mapping. - */ - mutex_lock(&kvm->lock); + mutex_lock(&kvm->arch.xen.xen_lock); /* * It is theoretically possible for the page to be unmapped @@ -1695,7 +1704,7 @@ static int kvm_xen_set_evtchn(struct kvm_xen_evtchn *xe, struct kvm *kvm) srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->srcu, idx); } while(!rc); - mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock); + mutex_unlock(&kvm->arch.xen.xen_lock); if (mm_borrowed) kthread_unuse_mm(kvm->mm); @@ -1811,7 +1820,7 @@ static int kvm_xen_eventfd_update(struct kvm *kvm, int ret; /* Protect writes to evtchnfd as well as the idr lookup. */ - mutex_lock(&kvm->lock); + mutex_lock(&kvm->arch.xen.xen_lock); evtchnfd = idr_find(&kvm->arch.xen.evtchn_ports, port); ret = -ENOENT; @@ -1842,7 +1851,7 @@ static int kvm_xen_eventfd_update(struct kvm *kvm, } ret = 0; out_unlock: - mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock); + mutex_unlock(&kvm->arch.xen.xen_lock); return ret; } @@ -1905,10 +1914,10 @@ static int kvm_xen_eventfd_assign(struct kvm *kvm, evtchnfd->deliver.port.priority = data->u.evtchn.deliver.port.priority; } - mutex_lock(&kvm->lock); + mutex_lock(&kvm->arch.xen.xen_lock); ret = idr_alloc(&kvm->arch.xen.evtchn_ports, evtchnfd, port, port + 1, GFP_KERNEL); - mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock); + mutex_unlock(&kvm->arch.xen.xen_lock); if (ret >= 0) return 0; @@ -1926,9 +1935,9 @@ static int kvm_xen_eventfd_deassign(struct kvm *kvm, u32 port) { struct evtchnfd *evtchnfd; - mutex_lock(&kvm->lock); + mutex_lock(&kvm->arch.xen.xen_lock); evtchnfd = idr_remove(&kvm->arch.xen.evtchn_ports, port); - mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock); + mutex_unlock(&kvm->arch.xen.xen_lock); if (!evtchnfd) return -ENOENT; @@ -1946,7 +1955,7 @@ static int kvm_xen_eventfd_reset(struct kvm *kvm) int i; int n = 0; - mutex_lock(&kvm->lock); + mutex_lock(&kvm->arch.xen.xen_lock); /* * Because synchronize_srcu() cannot be called inside the @@ -1958,7 +1967,7 @@ static int kvm_xen_eventfd_reset(struct kvm *kvm) all_evtchnfds = kmalloc_array(n, sizeof(struct evtchnfd *), GFP_KERNEL); if (!all_evtchnfds) { - mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock); + mutex_unlock(&kvm->arch.xen.xen_lock); return -ENOMEM; } @@ -1967,7 +1976,7 @@ static int kvm_xen_eventfd_reset(struct kvm *kvm) all_evtchnfds[n++] = evtchnfd; idr_remove(&kvm->arch.xen.evtchn_ports, evtchnfd->send_port); } - mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock); + mutex_unlock(&kvm->arch.xen.xen_lock); synchronize_srcu(&kvm->srcu); @@ -2069,6 +2078,7 @@ void kvm_xen_destroy_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) void kvm_xen_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm) { + mutex_init(&kvm->arch.xen.xen_lock); idr_init(&kvm->arch.xen.evtchn_ports); kvm_gpc_init(&kvm->arch.xen.shinfo_cache, kvm, NULL, KVM_HOST_USES_PFN); } |