summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/x86/kernel/cpu
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>2013-06-08 18:48:15 +0200
committerIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>2013-06-20 12:27:41 +0200
commit719038de98bc8479b771c582a1e4a1e86079da22 (patch)
tree92eac51c7a8d0e89cf683fc195f88278ef5155cf /arch/x86/kernel/cpu
parent4d067d8e056d76a3327f0517c7722db55e7888fc (diff)
x86/intel/cacheinfo: Shut up last long-standing warning
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_cacheinfo.c: In function ‘init_intel_cacheinfo’: arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_cacheinfo.c:642:28: warning: ‘this_leaf.size’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_cacheinfo.c:643:29: warning: ‘this_leaf.eax.split.num_threads_sharing’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] This keeps on happening during randbuilds and the compiler is wrong here: In the case where cpuid4_cache_lookup_regs() returns 0, both this_leaf.size and this_leaf.eax get initialized. In the case where the CPUID leaf doesn't contain valid cache info, we error out which init_intel_cacheinfo() handles correctly without touching the abovementioned fields. So shut up the warning by clearing out the struct which we hand down. While at it, reverse error handling and gain one indentation level. Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1370710095-20547-1-git-send-email-bp@alien8.de Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/x86/kernel/cpu')
-rw-r--r--arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_cacheinfo.c52
1 files changed, 25 insertions, 27 deletions
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_cacheinfo.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_cacheinfo.c
index 7c6f7d548c0f..8dc72dda66fe 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_cacheinfo.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_cacheinfo.c
@@ -618,36 +618,34 @@ unsigned int __cpuinit init_intel_cacheinfo(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
* parameters cpuid leaf to find the cache details
*/
for (i = 0; i < num_cache_leaves; i++) {
- struct _cpuid4_info_regs this_leaf;
+ struct _cpuid4_info_regs this_leaf = {};
int retval;
retval = cpuid4_cache_lookup_regs(i, &this_leaf);
- if (retval >= 0) {
- switch (this_leaf.eax.split.level) {
- case 1:
- if (this_leaf.eax.split.type ==
- CACHE_TYPE_DATA)
- new_l1d = this_leaf.size/1024;
- else if (this_leaf.eax.split.type ==
- CACHE_TYPE_INST)
- new_l1i = this_leaf.size/1024;
- break;
- case 2:
- new_l2 = this_leaf.size/1024;
- num_threads_sharing = 1 + this_leaf.eax.split.num_threads_sharing;
- index_msb = get_count_order(num_threads_sharing);
- l2_id = c->apicid & ~((1 << index_msb) - 1);
- break;
- case 3:
- new_l3 = this_leaf.size/1024;
- num_threads_sharing = 1 + this_leaf.eax.split.num_threads_sharing;
- index_msb = get_count_order(
- num_threads_sharing);
- l3_id = c->apicid & ~((1 << index_msb) - 1);
- break;
- default:
- break;
- }
+ if (retval < 0)
+ continue;
+
+ switch (this_leaf.eax.split.level) {
+ case 1:
+ if (this_leaf.eax.split.type == CACHE_TYPE_DATA)
+ new_l1d = this_leaf.size/1024;
+ else if (this_leaf.eax.split.type == CACHE_TYPE_INST)
+ new_l1i = this_leaf.size/1024;
+ break;
+ case 2:
+ new_l2 = this_leaf.size/1024;
+ num_threads_sharing = 1 + this_leaf.eax.split.num_threads_sharing;
+ index_msb = get_count_order(num_threads_sharing);
+ l2_id = c->apicid & ~((1 << index_msb) - 1);
+ break;
+ case 3:
+ new_l3 = this_leaf.size/1024;
+ num_threads_sharing = 1 + this_leaf.eax.split.num_threads_sharing;
+ index_msb = get_count_order(num_threads_sharing);
+ l3_id = c->apicid & ~((1 << index_msb) - 1);
+ break;
+ default:
+ break;
}
}
}