summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/Documentation
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorXujun Leng <lengxujun2007@126.com>2023-03-12 15:14:23 +0800
committerJonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>2023-03-14 11:31:08 -0600
commit42da2c00b91486980a724c05c29818a7e60a067e (patch)
tree206847c7643c1c4180a911bc35b6f5a0388a3336 /Documentation
parent87eae260995577d203a70d72d46976521a5687e1 (diff)
docs: process: typo fix
In the second paragraph of section "Respond to review comments", there is a spelling mistake: "aganst" should be "against". Signed-off-by: Xujun Leng <lengxujun2007@126.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230312071423.3042-1-lengxujun2007@126.com Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation')
-rw-r--r--Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst2
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst b/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
index eac7167dce83..69ce64e03c70 100644
--- a/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
+++ b/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
@@ -320,7 +320,7 @@ for their time. Code review is a tiring and time-consuming process, and
reviewers sometimes get grumpy. Even in that case, though, respond
politely and address the problems they have pointed out. When sending a next
version, add a ``patch changelog`` to the cover letter or to individual patches
-explaining difference aganst previous submission (see
+explaining difference against previous submission (see
:ref:`the_canonical_patch_format`).
See Documentation/process/email-clients.rst for recommendations on email