Merge tag 'docs-5.10-2' of git://git.lwn.net/linux

Pull documentation fixes from Jonathan Corbet:
 "A handful of late-arriving documentation fixes"

* tag 'docs-5.10-2' of git://git.lwn.net/linux:
  docs: Add two missing entries in vm sysctl index
  docs/vm: trivial fixes to several spelling mistakes
  docs: submitting-patches: describe preserving review/test tags
  Documentation: Chinese translation of Documentation/arm64/hugetlbpage.rst
  Documentation: x86: fix a missing word in x86_64/mm.rst.
  docs: driver-api: remove a duplicated index entry
  docs: lkdtm: Modernize and improve details
  docs: deprecated.rst: Expand str*cpy() replacement notes
  docs/cpu-load: format the example code.

2 files changed, 33 insertions, 18 deletions

diff --git a/Documentation/process/deprecated.rst b/Documentation/process/deprecated.rst
index ff71d802b53d..9d83b8db8874 100644
--- a/Documentation/process/deprecated.rst
+++ b/Documentation/process/deprecated.rst
@@ -106,23 +106,29 @@ NUL or newline terminated.
 
 strcpy()
 --------
-strcpy() performs no bounds checking on the destination
-buffer. This could result in linear overflows beyond the
-end of the buffer, leading to all kinds of misbehaviors. While
-`CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE=y` and various compiler flags help reduce the
-risk of using this function, there is no good reason to add new uses of
-this function. The safe replacement is strscpy().
+strcpy() performs no bounds checking on the destination buffer. This
+could result in linear overflows beyond the end of the buffer, leading to
+all kinds of misbehaviors. While `CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE=y` and various
+compiler flags help reduce the risk of using this function, there is
+no good reason to add new uses of this function. The safe replacement
+is strscpy(), though care must be given to any cases where the return
+value of strcpy() was used, since strscpy() does not return a pointer to
+the destination, but rather a count of non-NUL bytes copied (or negative
+errno when it truncates).
 
 strncpy() on NUL-terminated strings
 -----------------------------------
-Use of strncpy() does not guarantee that the destination buffer
-will be NUL terminated. This can lead to various linear read overflows
-and other misbehavior due to the missing termination. It also NUL-pads the
-destination buffer if the source contents are shorter than the destination
-buffer size, which may be a needless performance penalty for callers using
-only NUL-terminated strings. The safe replacement is strscpy().
-(Users of strscpy() still needing NUL-padding should instead
-use strscpy_pad().)
+Use of strncpy() does not guarantee that the destination buffer will
+be NUL terminated. This can lead to various linear read overflows and
+other misbehavior due to the missing termination. It also NUL-pads
+the destination buffer if the source contents are shorter than the
+destination buffer size, which may be a needless performance penalty
+for callers using only NUL-terminated strings. The safe replacement is
+strscpy(), though care must be given to any cases where the return value
+of strncpy() was used, since strscpy() does not return a pointer to the
+destination, but rather a count of non-NUL bytes copied (or negative
+errno when it truncates). Any cases still needing NUL-padding should
+instead use strscpy_pad().
 
 If a caller is using non-NUL-terminated strings, strncpy() can
 still be used, but destinations should be marked with the `__nonstring
@@ -131,10 +137,12 @@ attribute to avoid future compiler warnings.
 
 strlcpy()
 ---------
-strlcpy() reads the entire source buffer first, possibly exceeding
-the given limit of bytes to copy. This is inefficient and can lead to
-linear read overflows if a source string is not NUL-terminated. The
-safe replacement is strscpy().
+strlcpy() reads the entire source buffer first (since the return value
+is meant to match that of strlen()). This read may exceed the destination
+size limit. This is both inefficient and can lead to linear read overflows
+if a source string is not NUL-terminated. The safe replacement is strscpy(),
+though care must be given to any cases where the return value of strlcpy()
+is used, since strscpy() will return negative errno values when it truncates.
 
 %p format specifier
 -------------------
diff --git a/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst b/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
index 58586ffe2808..83d9a82055a7 100644
--- a/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
+++ b/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
@@ -527,6 +527,13 @@ done on the patch.  Reviewed-by: tags, when supplied by reviewers known to
 understand the subject area and to perform thorough reviews, will normally
 increase the likelihood of your patch getting into the kernel.
 
+Both Tested-by and Reviewed-by tags, once received on mailing list from tester
+or reviewer, should be added by author to the applicable patches when sending
+next versions.  However if the patch has changed substantially in following
+version, these tags might not be applicable anymore and thus should be removed.
+Usually removal of someone's Tested-by or Reviewed-by tags should be mentioned
+in the patch changelog (after the '---' separator).
+
 A Suggested-by: tag indicates that the patch idea is suggested by the person
 named and ensures credit to the person for the idea. Please note that this
 tag should not be added without the reporter's permission, especially if the