diff options
author | Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> | 2015-12-03 14:47:32 -0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> | 2015-12-08 17:10:20 -0800 |
commit | e488ca9f8d4f62c2dc36bfa5c32f68e7f05ab381 (patch) | |
tree | 1679a478caabfbad8c177678afb4358d1130caad /Documentation/networking | |
parent | 8c62b4e118cfa7a3c906c01d4ba2c78a5bd97531 (diff) |
doc: dt: mtd: partitions: add compatible property to "partitions" node
As noted here [1], there are potentially future conflicts if we try to
use MTD's "partitions" subnode to describe anything besides just the
fixed-in-the-device-tree partitions currently described in this
document. Particularly, there was a proposal to use this node for the
AFS parser too.
It can pose a (small) problem to try to differentiate the following
nodes:
// using binding as currently specified
partitions {
#address-cells = <x>;
#size-cells = <y>;
partition@0 {
...;
};
};
and
// proposed future binding
partitions {
compatible = "arm,arm-flash-structure";
};
It's especially difficult if other uses of this node start having
subnodes.
So, since the "partitions" node is new in v4.4, let's fixup the binding
before release so that it requires a compatible property, so it's much
clearer to distinguish. e.g.:
// proposed
partitions {
compatible = "fixed-partitions";
#address-cells = <x>;
#size-cells = <y>;
partition@0 {
...;
};
};
[1] Subject: "mtd: create a partition type device tree binding"
http://lkml.kernel.org/g/20151113220039.GA74382@google.com
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2015-November/063355.html
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2015-November/063364.html
Cc: Michal Suchanek <hramrach@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/networking')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions