diff options
author | Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> | 2006-10-02 08:45:08 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> | 2006-10-02 08:45:08 -0400 |
commit | 59458f40e25915a355d8b1d701425fe9f4f9ea23 (patch) | |
tree | f1c9a2934df686e36d75f759ab7313b6f0e0e5f9 /Documentation/CodingStyle | |
parent | 825f9075d74028d11d7f5932f04e1b5db3022b51 (diff) | |
parent | d834c16516d1ebec4766fc58c059bf01311e6045 (diff) |
Merge branch 'master' into gfs2
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/CodingStyle')
-rw-r--r-- | Documentation/CodingStyle | 34 |
1 files changed, 34 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/CodingStyle b/Documentation/CodingStyle index 6d2412ec91ed..29c18966b050 100644 --- a/Documentation/CodingStyle +++ b/Documentation/CodingStyle @@ -532,6 +532,40 @@ appears outweighs the potential value of the hint that tells gcc to do something it would have done anyway. + Chapter 16: Function return values and names + +Functions can return values of many different kinds, and one of the +most common is a value indicating whether the function succeeded or +failed. Such a value can be represented as an error-code integer +(-Exxx = failure, 0 = success) or a "succeeded" boolean (0 = failure, +non-zero = success). + +Mixing up these two sorts of representations is a fertile source of +difficult-to-find bugs. If the C language included a strong distinction +between integers and booleans then the compiler would find these mistakes +for us... but it doesn't. To help prevent such bugs, always follow this +convention: + + If the name of a function is an action or an imperative command, + the function should return an error-code integer. If the name + is a predicate, the function should return a "succeeded" boolean. + +For example, "add work" is a command, and the add_work() function returns 0 +for success or -EBUSY for failure. In the same way, "PCI device present" is +a predicate, and the pci_dev_present() function returns 1 if it succeeds in +finding a matching device or 0 if it doesn't. + +All EXPORTed functions must respect this convention, and so should all +public functions. Private (static) functions need not, but it is +recommended that they do. + +Functions whose return value is the actual result of a computation, rather +than an indication of whether the computation succeeded, are not subject to +this rule. Generally they indicate failure by returning some out-of-range +result. Typical examples would be functions that return pointers; they use +NULL or the ERR_PTR mechanism to report failure. + + Appendix I: References |