summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorSuman Ghosh <sumang@marvell.com>2023-11-21 22:26:24 +0530
committerPaolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>2023-11-23 12:55:32 +0100
commit4aa1d8f89b10cdc25a231dabf808d8935e0b137a (patch)
treeb3be378f52396514d5d54db43a742bcfa159a672
parent99360d9620f09fb8bc15548d855011bbb198c680 (diff)
octeontx2-pf: Fix ntuple rule creation to direct packet to VF with higher Rx queue than its PF
It is possible to add a ntuple rule which would like to direct packet to a VF whose number of queues are greater/less than its PF's queue numbers. For example a PF can have 2 Rx queues but a VF created on that PF can have 8 Rx queues. As of today, ntuple rule will reject rule because it is checking the requested queue number against PF's number of Rx queues. As a part of this fix if the action of a ntuple rule is to move a packet to a VF's queue then the check is removed. Also, a debug information is printed to aware user that it is user's responsibility to cross check if the requested queue number on that VF is a valid one. Fixes: f0a1913f8a6f ("octeontx2-pf: Add support for ethtool ntuple filters") Signed-off-by: Suman Ghosh <sumang@marvell.com> Reviewed-by: Wojciech Drewek <wojciech.drewek@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231121165624.3664182-1-sumang@marvell.com Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
-rw-r--r--drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_flows.c20
1 files changed, 19 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_flows.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_flows.c
index 4762dbea64a1..97a71e9b8563 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_flows.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_flows.c
@@ -1088,6 +1088,7 @@ int otx2_add_flow(struct otx2_nic *pfvf, struct ethtool_rxnfc *nfc)
struct ethhdr *eth_hdr;
bool new = false;
int err = 0;
+ u64 vf_num;
u32 ring;
if (!flow_cfg->max_flows) {
@@ -1100,7 +1101,21 @@ int otx2_add_flow(struct otx2_nic *pfvf, struct ethtool_rxnfc *nfc)
if (!(pfvf->flags & OTX2_FLAG_NTUPLE_SUPPORT))
return -ENOMEM;
- if (ring >= pfvf->hw.rx_queues && fsp->ring_cookie != RX_CLS_FLOW_DISC)
+ /* Number of queues on a VF can be greater or less than
+ * the PF's queue. Hence no need to check for the
+ * queue count. Hence no need to check queue count if PF
+ * is installing for its VF. Below is the expected vf_num value
+ * based on the ethtool commands.
+ *
+ * e.g.
+ * 1. ethtool -U <netdev> ... action -1 ==> vf_num:255
+ * 2. ethtool -U <netdev> ... action <queue_num> ==> vf_num:0
+ * 3. ethtool -U <netdev> ... vf <vf_idx> queue <queue_num> ==>
+ * vf_num:vf_idx+1
+ */
+ vf_num = ethtool_get_flow_spec_ring_vf(fsp->ring_cookie);
+ if (!is_otx2_vf(pfvf->pcifunc) && !vf_num &&
+ ring >= pfvf->hw.rx_queues && fsp->ring_cookie != RX_CLS_FLOW_DISC)
return -EINVAL;
if (fsp->location >= otx2_get_maxflows(flow_cfg))
@@ -1182,6 +1197,9 @@ int otx2_add_flow(struct otx2_nic *pfvf, struct ethtool_rxnfc *nfc)
flow_cfg->nr_flows++;
}
+ if (flow->is_vf)
+ netdev_info(pfvf->netdev,
+ "Make sure that VF's queue number is within its queue limit\n");
return 0;
}