diff options
| author | Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> | 2018-02-21 07:54:47 -0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> | 2018-03-28 01:39:02 -0400 |
| commit | 2c2acd2d193595f2919583fd6e32b09ca8e85e94 (patch) | |
| tree | 8f00ac95efc37a49b09aca218ed9be3eb28cfa89 | |
| parent | 937d3305126da49067da74280d72b457555a0aee (diff) | |
ntfs: fix bogus __mark_inode_dirty(I_DIRTY_SYNC | I_DIRTY_DATASYNC) call
I_DIRTY_DATASYNC is a strict superset of I_DIRTY_SYNC semantics, as
in mark dirty to be written out by fdatasync as well. So dirtying
for both flags makes no sense.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
| -rw-r--r-- | fs/ntfs/mft.c | 4 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/fs/ntfs/mft.c b/fs/ntfs/mft.c index 2831f495a674..32c523cf5a2d 100644 --- a/fs/ntfs/mft.c +++ b/fs/ntfs/mft.c @@ -381,7 +381,7 @@ unm_err_out: * vfs inode dirty. This ensures that any changes to the mft record are * written out to disk. * - * NOTE: We only set I_DIRTY_SYNC and I_DIRTY_DATASYNC (and not I_DIRTY_PAGES) + * NOTE: We only set I_DIRTY_DATASYNC (and not I_DIRTY_PAGES) * on the base vfs inode, because even though file data may have been modified, * it is dirty in the inode meta data rather than the data page cache of the * inode, and thus there are no data pages that need writing out. Therefore, a @@ -407,7 +407,7 @@ void __mark_mft_record_dirty(ntfs_inode *ni) else base_ni = ni->ext.base_ntfs_ino; mutex_unlock(&ni->extent_lock); - __mark_inode_dirty(VFS_I(base_ni), I_DIRTY_SYNC | I_DIRTY_DATASYNC); + __mark_inode_dirty(VFS_I(base_ni), I_DIRTY_DATASYNC); } static const char *ntfs_please_email = "Please email " |