diff options
| author | Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> | 2022-03-22 14:45:47 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2022-03-22 15:57:08 -0700 |
| commit | ff042f4a9b050895a42cae893cc01fa2ca81b95c (patch) | |
| tree | 420e18ca40e3ed944a162adf315425bc04e69a20 | |
| parent | 405cc51fc1049c73ae03ce3771a2511a7cf8b240 (diff) | |
mm: lru_cache_disable: replace work queue synchronization with synchronize_rcu
On systems that run FIFO:1 applications that busy loop, any SCHED_OTHER
task that attempts to execute on such a CPU (such as work threads) will
not be scheduled, which leads to system hangs.
Commit d479960e44f27e0e5 ("mm: disable LRU pagevec during the migration
temporarily") relies on queueing work items on all online CPUs to ensure
visibility of lru_disable_count.
To fix this, replace the usage of work items with synchronize_rcu,
which provides the same guarantees.
Readers of lru_disable_count are protected by either disabling
preemption or rcu_read_lock:
preempt_disable, local_irq_disable [bh_lru_lock()]
rcu_read_lock [rt_spin_lock CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT]
preempt_disable [local_lock !CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT]
Since v5.1 kernel, synchronize_rcu() is guaranteed to wait on
preempt_disable() regions of code. So any CPU which sees
lru_disable_count = 0 will have exited the critical section when
synchronize_rcu() returns.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/Yin7hDxdt0s/x+fp@fuller.cnet
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzju@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
| -rw-r--r-- | mm/swap.c | 23 |
1 files changed, 14 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/mm/swap.c b/mm/swap.c index e9786c4f36d8..754520bab299 100644 --- a/mm/swap.c +++ b/mm/swap.c @@ -831,8 +831,7 @@ inline void __lru_add_drain_all(bool force_all_cpus) for_each_online_cpu(cpu) { struct work_struct *work = &per_cpu(lru_add_drain_work, cpu); - if (force_all_cpus || - pagevec_count(&per_cpu(lru_pvecs.lru_add, cpu)) || + if (pagevec_count(&per_cpu(lru_pvecs.lru_add, cpu)) || data_race(pagevec_count(&per_cpu(lru_rotate.pvec, cpu))) || pagevec_count(&per_cpu(lru_pvecs.lru_deactivate_file, cpu)) || pagevec_count(&per_cpu(lru_pvecs.lru_deactivate, cpu)) || @@ -876,15 +875,21 @@ atomic_t lru_disable_count = ATOMIC_INIT(0); void lru_cache_disable(void) { atomic_inc(&lru_disable_count); -#ifdef CONFIG_SMP /* - * lru_add_drain_all in the force mode will schedule draining on - * all online CPUs so any calls of lru_cache_disabled wrapped by - * local_lock or preemption disabled would be ordered by that. - * The atomic operation doesn't need to have stronger ordering - * requirements because that is enforced by the scheduling - * guarantees. + * Readers of lru_disable_count are protected by either disabling + * preemption or rcu_read_lock: + * + * preempt_disable, local_irq_disable [bh_lru_lock()] + * rcu_read_lock [rt_spin_lock CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT] + * preempt_disable [local_lock !CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT] + * + * Since v5.1 kernel, synchronize_rcu() is guaranteed to wait on + * preempt_disable() regions of code. So any CPU which sees + * lru_disable_count = 0 will have exited the critical + * section when synchronize_rcu() returns. */ + synchronize_rcu(); +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP __lru_add_drain_all(true); #else lru_add_and_bh_lrus_drain(); |