summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAlexander Gordeev <agordeev@redhat.com>2014-06-12 17:05:37 +0200
committerJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>2014-06-17 22:13:05 -0700
commit2971c35f35886b87af54675313a2afef937c1b0c (patch)
tree3a812e2286298ca05f764e93c777a80adc310d40
parent8537b12034cf1fd3fab3da2c859d71f76846fae9 (diff)
blk-mq: bitmap tag: fix race on blk_mq_bitmap_tags::wake_cnt
This piece of code in bt_clear_tag() function is racy: bs = bt_wake_ptr(bt); if (bs && atomic_dec_and_test(&bs->wait_cnt)) { atomic_set(&bs->wait_cnt, bt->wake_cnt); wake_up(&bs->wait); } Since nothing prevents bt_wake_ptr() from returning the very same 'bs' address on multiple CPUs, the following scenario is possible: CPU1 CPU2 ---- ---- 0. bs = bt_wake_ptr(bt); bs = bt_wake_ptr(bt); 1. atomic_dec_and_test(&bs->wait_cnt) 2. atomic_dec_and_test(&bs->wait_cnt) 3. atomic_set(&bs->wait_cnt, bt->wake_cnt); If the decrement in [1] yields zero then for some amount of time the decrement in [2] results in a negative/overflow value, which is not expected. The follow-up assignment in [3] overwrites the invalid value with the batch value (and likely prevents the issue from being severe) which is still incorrect and should be a lesser. Cc: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
-rw-r--r--block/blk-mq-tag.c14
1 files changed, 12 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/block/blk-mq-tag.c b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
index 6deb13055490..08fc6716d362 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq-tag.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
@@ -344,6 +344,7 @@ static void bt_clear_tag(struct blk_mq_bitmap_tags *bt, unsigned int tag)
{
const int index = TAG_TO_INDEX(bt, tag);
struct bt_wait_state *bs;
+ int wait_cnt;
/*
* The unlock memory barrier need to order access to req in free
@@ -352,10 +353,19 @@ static void bt_clear_tag(struct blk_mq_bitmap_tags *bt, unsigned int tag)
clear_bit_unlock(TAG_TO_BIT(bt, tag), &bt->map[index].word);
bs = bt_wake_ptr(bt);
- if (bs && atomic_dec_and_test(&bs->wait_cnt)) {
- atomic_set(&bs->wait_cnt, bt->wake_cnt);
+ if (!bs)
+ return;
+
+ wait_cnt = atomic_dec_return(&bs->wait_cnt);
+ if (wait_cnt == 0) {
+wake:
+ atomic_add(bt->wake_cnt, &bs->wait_cnt);
bt_index_atomic_inc(&bt->wake_index);
wake_up(&bs->wait);
+ } else if (wait_cnt < 0) {
+ wait_cnt = atomic_inc_return(&bs->wait_cnt);
+ if (!wait_cnt)
+ goto wake;
}
}