diff options
author | Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> | 2016-01-15 16:57:31 -0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2016-01-15 17:56:32 -0800 |
commit | 88f306b68cbb36e500da4b9601b2e3d13dd683c4 (patch) | |
tree | e0373c2ee59446b3f8f9c2bfae9f75ff05e73f6c | |
parent | d645fc0eabbe783d34a14fbb31768ad8571f0ad4 (diff) |
mm: fix locking order in mm_take_all_locks()
Dmitry Vyukov has reported[1] possible deadlock (triggered by his
syzkaller fuzzer):
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&hugetlbfs_i_mmap_rwsem_key);
lock(&mapping->i_mmap_rwsem);
lock(&hugetlbfs_i_mmap_rwsem_key);
lock(&mapping->i_mmap_rwsem);
Both traces points to mm_take_all_locks() as a source of the problem.
It doesn't take care about ordering or hugetlbfs_i_mmap_rwsem_key (aka
mapping->i_mmap_rwsem for hugetlb mapping) vs. i_mmap_rwsem.
huge_pmd_share() does memory allocation under hugetlbfs_i_mmap_rwsem_key
and allocator can take i_mmap_rwsem if it hit reclaim. So we need to
take i_mmap_rwsem from all hugetlb VMAs before taking i_mmap_rwsem from
rest of VMAs.
The patch also documents locking order for hugetlbfs_i_mmap_rwsem_key.
[1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/CACT4Y+Zu95tBs-0EvdiAKzUOsb4tczRRfCRTpLr4bg_OP9HuVg@mail.gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-rw-r--r-- | fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c | 2 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | mm/mmap.c | 25 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | mm/rmap.c | 31 |
3 files changed, 37 insertions, 21 deletions
diff --git a/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c b/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c index 47789292a582..bbc333b01ca3 100644 --- a/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c +++ b/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c @@ -708,7 +708,7 @@ static struct inode *hugetlbfs_get_root(struct super_block *sb, /* * Hugetlbfs is not reclaimable; therefore its i_mmap_rwsem will never * be taken from reclaim -- unlike regular filesystems. This needs an - * annotation because huge_pmd_share() does an allocation under + * annotation because huge_pmd_share() does an allocation under hugetlb's * i_mmap_rwsem. */ static struct lock_class_key hugetlbfs_i_mmap_rwsem_key; diff --git a/mm/mmap.c b/mm/mmap.c index b3f00b616b81..84b12624ceb0 100644 --- a/mm/mmap.c +++ b/mm/mmap.c @@ -3184,10 +3184,16 @@ static void vm_lock_mapping(struct mm_struct *mm, struct address_space *mapping) * mapping->flags avoid to take the same lock twice, if more than one * vma in this mm is backed by the same anon_vma or address_space. * - * We can take all the locks in random order because the VM code - * taking i_mmap_rwsem or anon_vma->rwsem outside the mmap_sem never - * takes more than one of them in a row. Secondly we're protected - * against a concurrent mm_take_all_locks() by the mm_all_locks_mutex. + * We take locks in following order, accordingly to comment at beginning + * of mm/rmap.c: + * - all hugetlbfs_i_mmap_rwsem_key locks (aka mapping->i_mmap_rwsem for + * hugetlb mapping); + * - all i_mmap_rwsem locks; + * - all anon_vma->rwseml + * + * We can take all locks within these types randomly because the VM code + * doesn't nest them and we protected from parallel mm_take_all_locks() by + * mm_all_locks_mutex. * * mm_take_all_locks() and mm_drop_all_locks are expensive operations * that may have to take thousand of locks. @@ -3206,7 +3212,16 @@ int mm_take_all_locks(struct mm_struct *mm) for (vma = mm->mmap; vma; vma = vma->vm_next) { if (signal_pending(current)) goto out_unlock; - if (vma->vm_file && vma->vm_file->f_mapping) + if (vma->vm_file && vma->vm_file->f_mapping && + is_vm_hugetlb_page(vma)) + vm_lock_mapping(mm, vma->vm_file->f_mapping); + } + + for (vma = mm->mmap; vma; vma = vma->vm_next) { + if (signal_pending(current)) + goto out_unlock; + if (vma->vm_file && vma->vm_file->f_mapping && + !is_vm_hugetlb_page(vma)) vm_lock_mapping(mm, vma->vm_file->f_mapping); } diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c index 68af2e32f7ed..79f3bf047f38 100644 --- a/mm/rmap.c +++ b/mm/rmap.c @@ -23,21 +23,22 @@ * inode->i_mutex (while writing or truncating, not reading or faulting) * mm->mmap_sem * page->flags PG_locked (lock_page) - * mapping->i_mmap_rwsem - * anon_vma->rwsem - * mm->page_table_lock or pte_lock - * zone->lru_lock (in mark_page_accessed, isolate_lru_page) - * swap_lock (in swap_duplicate, swap_info_get) - * mmlist_lock (in mmput, drain_mmlist and others) - * mapping->private_lock (in __set_page_dirty_buffers) - * mem_cgroup_{begin,end}_page_stat (memcg->move_lock) - * mapping->tree_lock (widely used) - * inode->i_lock (in set_page_dirty's __mark_inode_dirty) - * bdi.wb->list_lock (in set_page_dirty's __mark_inode_dirty) - * sb_lock (within inode_lock in fs/fs-writeback.c) - * mapping->tree_lock (widely used, in set_page_dirty, - * in arch-dependent flush_dcache_mmap_lock, - * within bdi.wb->list_lock in __sync_single_inode) + * hugetlbfs_i_mmap_rwsem_key (in huge_pmd_share) + * mapping->i_mmap_rwsem + * anon_vma->rwsem + * mm->page_table_lock or pte_lock + * zone->lru_lock (in mark_page_accessed, isolate_lru_page) + * swap_lock (in swap_duplicate, swap_info_get) + * mmlist_lock (in mmput, drain_mmlist and others) + * mapping->private_lock (in __set_page_dirty_buffers) + * mem_cgroup_{begin,end}_page_stat (memcg->move_lock) + * mapping->tree_lock (widely used) + * inode->i_lock (in set_page_dirty's __mark_inode_dirty) + * bdi.wb->list_lock (in set_page_dirty's __mark_inode_dirty) + * sb_lock (within inode_lock in fs/fs-writeback.c) + * mapping->tree_lock (widely used, in set_page_dirty, + * in arch-dependent flush_dcache_mmap_lock, + * within bdi.wb->list_lock in __sync_single_inode) * * anon_vma->rwsem,mapping->i_mutex (memory_failure, collect_procs_anon) * ->tasklist_lock |